Comparison of postoperative visual quality after SMILE and LASEK for high myopia: A 1-year outcome
- PMID: 28771544
- PMCID: PMC5542625
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182251
Comparison of postoperative visual quality after SMILE and LASEK for high myopia: A 1-year outcome
Abstract
Purpose: To compare the 1-year outcome of visual quality after laser-assisted subepithelial keratomileusis (LASEK) and femtosecond laser-assisted small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) for high myopia correction.
Materials and methods: This prospective, comparative study included 24 eyes of 24 patients in the LASEK group, with a mean spherical equivalent (SE) of -7.59 ± 1.32 diopters, and 26 eyes of 26 patients in the SMILE group, with a mean SE of -7.91 ± 1.08 diopters. Visual acuity, corneal topography, contrast sensitivity (CS), and wavefront aberrations were recorded preoperatively and compared with postoperative measurements. Objective scatter index (OSI) and modulation transfer function (MTF) cut-off frequency were measured 1 year postoperatively.
Results: One year postoperatively, the two groups demonstrated no significant difference in the CS at all spatial frequencies. The increments of higher-order aberrations (HOAs) (HOA = 0.583 ± 0.210 μm), including spherical aberration (SA) (SA = 0.546 ± 0.249 μm), were higher (P < 0.05) in the LASEK group than those in the SMILE group (HOA = 0.451 ± 0.143 μm; SA = 0.450 ± 0.340 μm) after surgery. There were no significant differences in the increments of coma and trefoil aberrations between the two groups. The OSI and MTF cut-off frequency exhibited no significant differences between the two groups postoperatively. No vision-threatening complications were noted at any stage in either group.
Conclusions: Both LASEK and SMILE are safe and effective surgical options for the correction of high myopia. SMILE has a lower HOAs and SA induction rate 1 year postoperatively.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures


Similar articles
-
Comparison of Visual Quality After SMILE and LASEK for Mild to Moderate Myopia.J Refract Surg. 2015 Dec;31(12):795-800. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20151111-02. J Refract Surg. 2015. PMID: 26653723
-
Comparative study of wave-front aberration and corneal Asphericity after SMILE and LASEK for myopia: a short and long term study.BMC Ophthalmol. 2019 Mar 20;19(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s12886-019-1084-3. BMC Ophthalmol. 2019. PMID: 30894159 Free PMC article.
-
Long-term visual quality after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and laser assisted subepithelial keratomileusis (LASEK) for low myopia.BMC Ophthalmol. 2022 Aug 18;22(1):347. doi: 10.1186/s12886-022-02568-8. BMC Ophthalmol. 2022. PMID: 35978275 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of femtosecond laser small-incision lenticule extraction and laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy to correct myopic astigmatism.J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015 Nov;41(11):2476-86. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.05.043. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015. PMID: 26703499
-
Differences in ocular high order aberrations before and after small incision lenticule extraction for correction of myopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Mar 27;11:1274101. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1274101. eCollection 2024. Front Med (Lausanne). 2024. PMID: 38601117 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Comparison of Corneal Densitometry and Visual Quality after Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE) and Laser Epithelial Keratomileusis (LASEK): One-Year Comparative Study.Biomed Res Int. 2023 Feb 2;2023:3430742. doi: 10.1155/2023/3430742. eCollection 2023. Biomed Res Int. 2023. PMID: 36778055 Free PMC article.
-
Initial Single-Site Surgical Experience with SMILE: A Comparison of Results to FDA SMILE, and the Earliest and Latest Generation of LASIK.Ophthalmol Ther. 2018 Dec;7(2):347-360. doi: 10.1007/s40123-018-0137-7. Epub 2018 Jun 29. Ophthalmol Ther. 2018. PMID: 29959753 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of objective and subjective visual quality after flapless laser vision correction for mild to moderate myopia: SMILE vs PRK.Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2023 Jun;261(6):1731-1741. doi: 10.1007/s00417-022-05937-7. Epub 2023 Jan 18. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2023. PMID: 36652015
-
Comparison of visual outcomes and optical aberrations after SMILE with intraoperative Kappa angle adjustments between small and large Kappa angles.Sci Rep. 2024 Jun 24;14(1):14551. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-65366-w. Sci Rep. 2024. PMID: 38914606 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of changes in objective visual quality based on tear film stability after SMILE surgery.Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Apr 25;12:1538359. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1538359. eCollection 2025. Front Med (Lausanne). 2025. PMID: 40351463 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Holden BA, Fricke TR, Wilson DA, Jong M, Naidoo KS, Sankaridurg P, et al. (2016) Global Prevalence of Myopia and High Myopia and Temporal Trends from 2000 through 2050. Ophthalmology 123: 1036–1042. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.01.006 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Fricke TR, Holden BA, Wilson DA, Schlenther G, Naidoo KS, Resnikoff S, et al. (2012) Global cost of correcting vision impairment from uncorrected refractive error. Bull World Health Organ 90: 728–738. doi: 10.2471/BLT.12.104034 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Al-Tobaigy FM (2012) Efficacy, predictability, and safety of laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy for the treatment of myopia and myopic astigmatism. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol 19: 304–308. doi: 10.4103/0974-9233.97931 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Chansue E, Tanehsakdi M, Swasdibutra S, McAlinden C (2015) Efficacy, predictability and safety of small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE). Eye Vis (Lond) 2: 14 doi: 10.1186/s40662-015-0024-4 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Kirwan C, O'Keefe M (2009) Comparative study of higher-order aberrations after conventional laser in situ keratomileusis and laser epithelial keratomileusis for myopia using the technolas 217z laser platform. Am J Ophthalmol 147: 77–83. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2008.07.014 - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous