Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2017 Aug 3;12(8):e0182251.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182251. eCollection 2017.

Comparison of postoperative visual quality after SMILE and LASEK for high myopia: A 1-year outcome

Xiaoyu Zhu  1   2 , Leilei Zou  1   2 , Manrong Yu  1   2 , Chen Qiu  1   2 , Minjie Chen  1   2 , Jinhui Dai  1   2
Affiliations
Comparative Study

Comparison of postoperative visual quality after SMILE and LASEK for high myopia: A 1-year outcome

Xiaoyu Zhu et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the 1-year outcome of visual quality after laser-assisted subepithelial keratomileusis (LASEK) and femtosecond laser-assisted small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) for high myopia correction.

Materials and methods: This prospective, comparative study included 24 eyes of 24 patients in the LASEK group, with a mean spherical equivalent (SE) of -7.59 ± 1.32 diopters, and 26 eyes of 26 patients in the SMILE group, with a mean SE of -7.91 ± 1.08 diopters. Visual acuity, corneal topography, contrast sensitivity (CS), and wavefront aberrations were recorded preoperatively and compared with postoperative measurements. Objective scatter index (OSI) and modulation transfer function (MTF) cut-off frequency were measured 1 year postoperatively.

Results: One year postoperatively, the two groups demonstrated no significant difference in the CS at all spatial frequencies. The increments of higher-order aberrations (HOAs) (HOA = 0.583 ± 0.210 μm), including spherical aberration (SA) (SA = 0.546 ± 0.249 μm), were higher (P < 0.05) in the LASEK group than those in the SMILE group (HOA = 0.451 ± 0.143 μm; SA = 0.450 ± 0.340 μm) after surgery. There were no significant differences in the increments of coma and trefoil aberrations between the two groups. The OSI and MTF cut-off frequency exhibited no significant differences between the two groups postoperatively. No vision-threatening complications were noted at any stage in either group.

Conclusions: Both LASEK and SMILE are safe and effective surgical options for the correction of high myopia. SMILE has a lower HOAs and SA induction rate 1 year postoperatively.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Comparison of the wavefront aberrations between laser-assisted subepithelial keratomileusis (LASEK) and the small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) groups 1 year after surgery.
*P < 0.05 = statistically significant. HOA = higher-order aberrations; SA = spherical aberration; RMS = root mean square.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Comparison of (A, B) photopic and (C, D) scotopic contrast sensitivity between the (A, C) laser-assisted subepithelial keratomileusis (LASEK) and the (B, D) small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) groups at all spatial frequencies (6.3° to 0.7°), preoperatively and postoperatively.
Horizontal axis corresponds to visual angle of target size (degree). Vertical axis corresponds to log10 contrast sensitivity.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Holden BA, Fricke TR, Wilson DA, Jong M, Naidoo KS, Sankaridurg P, et al. (2016) Global Prevalence of Myopia and High Myopia and Temporal Trends from 2000 through 2050. Ophthalmology 123: 1036–1042. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.01.006 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fricke TR, Holden BA, Wilson DA, Schlenther G, Naidoo KS, Resnikoff S, et al. (2012) Global cost of correcting vision impairment from uncorrected refractive error. Bull World Health Organ 90: 728–738. doi: 10.2471/BLT.12.104034 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Al-Tobaigy FM (2012) Efficacy, predictability, and safety of laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy for the treatment of myopia and myopic astigmatism. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol 19: 304–308. doi: 10.4103/0974-9233.97931 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chansue E, Tanehsakdi M, Swasdibutra S, McAlinden C (2015) Efficacy, predictability and safety of small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE). Eye Vis (Lond) 2: 14 doi: 10.1186/s40662-015-0024-4 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kirwan C, O'Keefe M (2009) Comparative study of higher-order aberrations after conventional laser in situ keratomileusis and laser epithelial keratomileusis for myopia using the technolas 217z laser platform. Am J Ophthalmol 147: 77–83. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2008.07.014 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources