Does restoration of focal lumbar lordosis for single level degenerative spondylolisthesis result in better patient-reported clinical outcomes? A systematic literature review
- PMID: 28774491
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2017.06.039
Does restoration of focal lumbar lordosis for single level degenerative spondylolisthesis result in better patient-reported clinical outcomes? A systematic literature review
Abstract
It is controversial whether the surgical restoration of sagittal balance and spinopelvic angulation in a single level lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis results in clinical improvements. The purpose of this study to systematically review the available literature to determine whether the surgical correction of malalignment in lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis correlates with improvements in patient-reported clinical outcomes. Literature searches were performed via Ovid Medline, Embase, CENTRAL and Web of Science using search terms "lumbar," "degenerative/spondylolisthesis" and "surgery/surgical/surgeries/fusion". This resulted in 844 articles and after reviewing the abstracts and full-texts, 13 articles were included for summary and final analysis. There were two Level II articles, four Level III articles and five Level IV articles. Most commonly used patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were Oswestery disability index (ODI) and visual analogue scale (VAS). Four articles were included for the final statistical analysis. There was no statistically significant difference between the patient groups who achieved successful surgical correction of malalignment and those who did not for either ODI (mean difference -0.94, CI -8.89-7.00) or VAS (mean difference 1.57, CI -3.16-6.30). Two studies assessed the efficacy of manual reduction of lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis and their clinical outcomes after the operation, and there was no statistically significant improvement. Overall, the restoration of focal lumbar lordosis and restoration of sagittal balance for single-level lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis does not seem to yield clinical improvements but well-powered studies on this specific topic is lacking in the current literature. Future well-powered studies are needed for a more definitive conclusion.
Keywords: Deformity correction; Degenerative spondylolisthesis; Fusion; Lumbar; Patient-reported outcome measures; Surgery.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Effect of interbody fusion compared with posterolateral fusion on lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Spine J. 2022 May;22(5):756-768. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2021.12.001. Epub 2021 Dec 9. Spine J. 2022. PMID: 34896611
-
Minimally invasive versus mini-open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in managing low-grade degenerative spondylolisthesis.Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2024 Sep 12;166(1):365. doi: 10.1007/s00701-024-06231-7. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2024. PMID: 39264454 Free PMC article.
-
Cost-effectiveness of open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (OTLIF) versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MITLIF): a systematic review and meta-analysis.Spine J. 2021 Jun;21(6):945-954. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2021.01.018. Epub 2021 Jan 22. Spine J. 2021. PMID: 33493680
-
Fusion and nonsurgical treatment for symptomatic lumbar degenerative disease: a systematic review of Oswestry Disability Index and MOS Short Form-36 outcomes.Spine J. 2008 Sep-Oct;8(5):747-55. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2007.06.013. Epub 2007 Nov 26. Spine J. 2008. PMID: 18037354
-
Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) in lumbar spondylolisthesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Spine J. 2017 Nov;17(11):1712-1721. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2017.06.018. Epub 2017 Jun 21. Spine J. 2017. PMID: 28647584
Cited by
-
Failure to Improve Lumbar Lordosis After Single-Level TLIF for Degenerative Spondylolisthesis Does Not Impair Clinical Outcomes at 8.6 Years Postoperatively: A Prospective Cohort of 32 Patients.J Clin Med. 2025 Aug 3;14(15):5457. doi: 10.3390/jcm14155457. J Clin Med. 2025. PMID: 40807077 Free PMC article.
-
Does change in focal lordosis after spinal fusion affect clinical outcomes in degenerative spondylolisthesis?J Craniovertebr Junction Spine. 2022 Apr-Jun;13(2):127-139. doi: 10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_144_21. Epub 2022 Jun 13. J Craniovertebr Junction Spine. 2022. PMID: 35837437 Free PMC article.
-
Lumbar spinal fusion of low-grade degenerative spondylolisthesis (Meyerding grade I and II): Do reduction and correction of the radiological sagittal parameters correlate with better clinical outcome?Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2020 Sep;140(9):1155-1162. doi: 10.1007/s00402-019-03282-9. Epub 2019 Nov 16. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2020. PMID: 31734732
-
Relationship between lumbar lordosis, pelvic parameters, PI-LL mismatch and outcome after short fusion surgery for lumbar degenerative disease. Literature review, rational and presentation of public study protocol: RELApSE study (registry for evaluation of lumbar artrodesis sagittal alignEment).World Neurosurg X. 2023 Jan 27;18:100162. doi: 10.1016/j.wnsx.2023.100162. eCollection 2023 Apr. World Neurosurg X. 2023. PMID: 36818735 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Long-term Radiological and Clinical Outcome after Lumbar Spinal Fusion Surgery in Patients with Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: A Prospective 6-Year Follow-up Study.Orthop Surg. 2022 Aug;14(8):1607-1614. doi: 10.1111/os.13350. Epub 2022 Jun 16. Orthop Surg. 2022. PMID: 35711118 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical