Safety and efficiency of oocyte vitrification
- PMID: 28774548
- DOI: 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2017.07.009
Safety and efficiency of oocyte vitrification
Abstract
As the oocyte is the starting point for a new life, artificial reproductive technology (ART) techniques should not affect the (ultra) structural and functional integrity, or the developmental competence. Oocyte vitrification -one of the most significant achievements in human ART during the past decade- should therefore be a safe and efficient technique. This review discusses the principles and developments of the existing and future techniques, applications possibilities and safety concerns. The broad range of vitrification media and devices that are currently available, show differences in their effects on the oocyte ultrastructure and preimplantation development. It is not yet fully decided whether this has an influence on the obstetric and neonatal outcome, since only limited information is available with different media and devices. For autologous oocytes, the obstetric and neonatal outcomes appear promising and comparable to pregnancies obtained with fresh oocytes. This however, is not the case for heterologous fresh or vitrified oocytes, where the immunological foreign foetus induces adverse obstetric and neonatal outcomes. Besides the oocyte vitrification process itself, the effect of multiple stimulations (for oocyte banking or for oocyte donors), seems to influence the possibility to develop gynaecological cancers further in life. Automated vitrification/warming should offer a consistent, cross-contamination free process that offers the highest safety level for the users. They should also produce more consistent results in survival, development and clinical pregnancies between different IVF clinics.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Closed oocyte vitrification and storage in an oocyte donation programme: obstetric and neonatal outcome.Hum Reprod. 2016 May;31(5):1024-33. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dew029. Epub 2016 Mar 2. Hum Reprod. 2016. PMID: 26936884
-
How does vitrification affect oocyte viability in oocyte donation cycles? A prospective study to compare outcomes achieved with fresh versus vitrified sibling oocytes.Hum Reprod. 2013 Aug;28(8):2087-92. doi: 10.1093/humrep/det242. Epub 2013 Jun 5. Hum Reprod. 2013. PMID: 23744895
-
Successful elective and medically indicated oocyte vitrification and warming for autologous in vitro fertilization, with predicted birth probabilities for fertility preservation according to number of cryopreserved oocytes and age at retrieval.Fertil Steril. 2016 Feb;105(2):459-66.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.10.026. Epub 2015 Nov 18. Fertil Steril. 2016. PMID: 26604065
-
A critical appraisal of cryopreservation (slow cooling versus vitrification) of human oocytes and embryos.Hum Reprod Update. 2012 Sep-Oct;18(5):536-54. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dms016. Epub 2012 Apr 25. Hum Reprod Update. 2012. PMID: 22537859 Review.
-
Evolution of human oocyte cryopreservation: slow freezing versus vitrification.Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes. 2016 Dec;23(6):445-450. doi: 10.1097/MED.0000000000000289. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes. 2016. PMID: 27653002 Review.
Cited by
-
Blastocyst mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) is not affected by oocyte vitrification: a sibling oocyte study.J Assist Reprod Genet. 2020 Jun;37(6):1387-1397. doi: 10.1007/s10815-020-01795-6. Epub 2020 May 6. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2020. PMID: 32372301 Free PMC article.
-
A comprehensive review and update on human fertility cryopreservation methods and tools.Front Vet Sci. 2023 Apr 18;10:1151254. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1151254. eCollection 2023. Front Vet Sci. 2023. PMID: 37143497 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Health of 2-year-old children born after vitrified oocyte donation in comparison with peers born after fresh oocyte donation.Hum Reprod Open. 2021 Feb 19;2021(1):hoab002. doi: 10.1093/hropen/hoab002. eCollection 2021. Hum Reprod Open. 2021. PMID: 33634217 Free PMC article.
-
Expansion and herniation: evaluation of the best pregnancy rate predictor after quarter laser assisted hatching in frozen blastocyst transfers.JBRA Assist Reprod. 2020 May 1;24(2):170-172. doi: 10.5935/1518-0557.20190090. JBRA Assist Reprod. 2020. PMID: 32159314 Free PMC article.
-
Cancer fertility preservation: a report from a Brazilian social program.JBRA Assist Reprod. 2020 Jul 14;24(3):302-304. doi: 10.5935/1518-0557.20190089. JBRA Assist Reprod. 2020. PMID: 32293819 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous