Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jul 1:16:17-23.
eCollection 2017 Jan.

Larger Blood Pressure Reduction by Fixed-Dose Compared to Free Dose Combination Therapy of ACE Inhibitor and Calcium Antagonist in Hypertensive Patients

Affiliations

Larger Blood Pressure Reduction by Fixed-Dose Compared to Free Dose Combination Therapy of ACE Inhibitor and Calcium Antagonist in Hypertensive Patients

Valeria Visco et al. Transl Med UniSa. .

Abstract

The introduction of fixed combination of ACEi+CCB (Fixed) has significantly increased patients compliance and adherence to therapy. At the moment, however, there are no data suggesting the better control of once-daily fixed (Fixed) over free doses in separate administrations combination therapy in hypertensives. In a population of 39 consecutive outpatient patients referred to the departmental Hypertension clinic of the University Hospital of Salerno Medical School with the first diagnosis of arterial hypertension, we tested the hypothesis that the Fixed achieve a better control of blood pressure than the Free combination. Patients were randomized to either strategy and after 3 months patients underwent a clinical assessment to evaluate the antihypertensive effect. The two groups, matched for anthropometric and clinical parameters, received Amlodipine (5-10 mg/daily) and Perindopril (5-10 mg/daily). Perindopril and Amlodipine doses did not significantly differ between the two groups. After 3 months BP control was improved in both groups and BP targets were similarly reached in both groups (SBP; Fixed: 61.54%; Free 69.23%; n.s. DPB; Fixed: 80.77%; Free 84.62%; n.s.). The reduction in systolic blood pressure was similar in both groups (Fixed:7.64±2.49%; Free: 7.81±4.00%, n.s.), while the reduction of diastolic blood pressure was greater in the Fixed group (Fixed: 14.22±2.03%; Free: 4.92±5.00%, p<0.05). Although both strategies are effective in reducing BP, the use of Fixed dose has an advantage in the reduction of BP. The present study does not allow to identify the mechanisms of this difference, which can be assumed to be due to the pharmacokinetics of the drugs administered in once-daily fixed combination.

Keywords: ACE Inhibitors; Blood pressure control; Calcium Antagonist; Hypertension; combination therapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Effects of once-daily fixed dose vs free dose combination therapy on systolic blood pressure (SBP). Fixed group (Left graph) showed a statistically significant reduction of SBP, while the reduction of Free group (Right graph) was not significant. Statistic significance was assessed by T-test (*= p<0.05; FU= follow-up).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Effects of once-daily fixed dose vs free dose combination therapy on diastolic blood pressure (DBP). Fixed group (Left graph) showed a statistically significant reduction of DBP, while the reduction of Free group (Right graph) was not significant. Statistic significance was assessed by T-test (*= p<0.05; FU= follow-up).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Differences between fixed dose vs free dose combination therapy on blood pressure reduction. The reduction in systolic blood pressure (SBP) (Left graph) showed no major differences between the two groups, while the reduction of diastolic blood pressure (DBP) (Right graph) was significantly higher. Statistic significance was assessed by T-test (*= p<0.05).

References

    1. Tocci G, Rosei EA, Ambrosioni E, Borghi C, Ferri C, Ferrucci A, et al. Blood pressure control in italy: Analysis of clinical data from 2005–2011 surveys on hypertension. J Hypertens. 2012;30:1065–1074. - PubMed
    1. Bramlage P, Bohm M, Volpe M, Khan BV, Paar WD, Tebbe U, et al. A global perspective on blood pressure treatment and control in a referred cohort of hypertensive patients. Journal of clinical hypertension. 2010;12:666–677. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dallongeville J, Banegas JR, Tubach F, Guallar E, Borghi C, De Backer G, et al. Survey of physicians’ practices in the control of cardiovascular risk factors: The eurika study. European journal of preventive cardiology. 2012;19:541–550. - PubMed
    1. Prugger C, Keil U, Wellmann J, de Bacquer D, de Backer G, Ambrosio GB, et al. Blood pressure control and knowledge of target blood pressure in coronary patients across europe: Results from the euroaspire iii survey. Journal of hypertension. 2011;29:1641–1648. - PubMed
    1. Leape L, Berwick D, Clancy C, Conway J, Gluck P, Guest J, et al. Transforming healthcare: A safety imperative. Quality & safety in health care. 2009;18:424–428. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources