Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017;2(1):31.
doi: 10.1186/s41235-017-0065-4. Epub 2017 Jul 18.

The tip-of-the-tongue state and curiosity

Affiliations

The tip-of-the-tongue state and curiosity

Janet Metcalfe et al. Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2017.

Abstract

Theories of study time allocation and of curiosity suggest that people are most engaged with and want to devote their time to materials that are not completely mastered but also are not so difficult that they might be impossible. Their curiosity is thought to be triggered by items that are almost known, or are in what is sometimes called the region of proximal learning. Answers that are on the tip-of-the-tongue (TOT)-not immediately recallable but nevertheless evoking a feeling of imminent recall-seem, intuitively, to be materials that have this characteristic of being almost, but not quite, fully known. We therefore, hypothesized that people would be particularly curious to see the answers to questions for which the answers were on the tips of their tongues. To test the TOT curiosity hypothesis, we gave participants 82 general information questions and quickly asked whether the answers were or were not on the tips of their tongues and whether they wanted to see the answers later. Overwhelmingly, items that were accompanied by a TOT feeling were those which evoked participants' curiosity, regardless of whether the feeling occurred in conjunction with an error of commission, an error of omission, or even with the correct answer.

Keywords: Curiosity; Google; Metacognition; Region of proximal learning; Tip-of-the-tongue.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Probability of answer seeking given that the response was an omission error. Error bars: standard error of the mean. TOT: tip-of-the-tongue
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Probability of answer seeking given that the response was a commission error. Error bars: standard error of the mean. TOT: tip-of-the-tongue
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Probability of answer seeking given that the response was correct. Error bars: standard error of the mean. TOT: tip-of-the-tongue

References

    1. Atkinson RC. Ingredients for a theory of instruction. American Psychologist. 1972;27:921–931. doi: 10.1037/h0033572. - DOI
    1. Berlyne DE. A theory of human curiosity. British Journal of Psychology. 1954;45:180–191. - PubMed
    1. Bjork RA, Linn MC. The science of learning and the learning of science: Introducing desirable difficulties. Association for Psychological Science Observer. 2006;19:1–2.
    1. Brown, A. S., & Croft, K. (2014). There it is again on my tongue: Tracking repeat TOTs. In B. L. Schwartz & A. S. Brown (Eds.), Tip of the tongue states and related phenomena (pp. 32–49). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    1. Brown AS. A review of the tip-of-the-tongue experience. Psychological Bulletin. 1991;109:204–223. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.109.2.204. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources