Relating quality of life to outcomes and predictors in adult cochlear implant users: Are we measuring the right things?
- PMID: 28776711
- PMCID: PMC6192249
- DOI: 10.1002/lary.26791
Relating quality of life to outcomes and predictors in adult cochlear implant users: Are we measuring the right things?
Abstract
Objective: Current clinical outcome measures for adults receiving cochlear implants (CIs) consist of word and sentence recognition, primarily under quiet conditions. However, these measures may not adequately reflect patients' CI-specific quality of life (QOL). This study first examined traditional auditory-only speech recognition measures and other potentially relevant auditory measures as correlates of QOL in CI users. Second, scores on nonauditory tasks of language and cognition were examined as potential predictors of QOL.
Study design: Twenty-five postlingually deafened adults with CIs were assessed.
Methods: Participants completed a validated CI-specific QOL measure (the Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire) and were tested for word and sentence recognition in quiet, as well as sentence recognition in speech-shaped noise. Participants also completed assessments of audiovisual speech recognition, environmental sound identification, and a task of complex auditory verbal processing. Several nonauditory language and cognitive tasks were examined as potential predictors of QOL.
Results: Quality-of-life scores significantly correlated with scores for audiovisual speech recognition and recognition of complex sentences in quiet but not sentences in noise or isolated words. No significant correlations were obtained between QOL and environmental sound identification or complex auditory verbal processing. Quality-of-life subdomain scores were predicted by several nonauditory language and cognitive tasks as well as some patient characteristics.
Conclusion: Postoperative measures of recognition of sentences in quiet and audiovisual sentence recognition correlate with CI-related QOL. Findings suggest that sentence recognition tasks are QOL-relevant outcomes but only explain a small fraction of the variability in QOL outcomes for this patient population.
Level of evidence: 4. Laryngoscope, 128:959-966, 2018.
Keywords: Cochlear implants; cognition; quality of life; speech perception.
© 2017 The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.
Conflict of interest statement
Similar articles
-
Does quality of life depend on speech recognition performance for adult cochlear implant users?Laryngoscope. 2016 Mar;126(3):699-706. doi: 10.1002/lary.25525. Epub 2015 Aug 8. Laryngoscope. 2016. PMID: 26256441
-
How Does Quality of Life Relate to Auditory Abilities? A Subitem Analysis of the Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire.J Am Acad Audiol. 2020 Apr;31(4):292-301. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.19047. Epub 2020 Apr 15. J Am Acad Audiol. 2020. PMID: 31580803 Free PMC article.
-
Nonverbal Reasoning as a Contributor to Sentence Recognition Outcomes in Adults With Cochlear Implants.Otol Neurotol. 2018 Dec;39(10):e956-e963. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000001998. Otol Neurotol. 2018. PMID: 30444843 Free PMC article.
-
Meta-analysis of quality-of-life improvement after cochlear implantation and associations with speech recognition abilities.Laryngoscope. 2018 Apr;128(4):982-990. doi: 10.1002/lary.26738. Epub 2017 Jul 21. Laryngoscope. 2018. PMID: 28731538 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Systematic Review on Late Cochlear Implantation in Early-Deafened Adults and Adolescents: Clinical Effectiveness.Ear Hear. 2020 Nov/Dec;41(6):1417-1430. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000884. Ear Hear. 2020. PMID: 33136619
Cited by
-
Patient Benefit Following Bimodal CI-provision: Self-reported Abilities vs. Hearing Status.Front Neurol. 2018 Sep 10;9:753. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2018.00753. eCollection 2018. Front Neurol. 2018. PMID: 30250450 Free PMC article.
-
Speech Recognition and Listening Effort in Cochlear Implant Recipients and Normal-Hearing Listeners.Front Neurosci. 2022 Feb 10;15:725412. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2021.725412. eCollection 2021. Front Neurosci. 2022. PMID: 35221883 Free PMC article.
-
Self-reported Hearing Quality of Life for Adolescent Cochlear Implant Recipients: A Longitudinal Study.J Am Acad Audiol. 2024 Jul;35(7-08):178-184. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1791212. Epub 2024 Dec 19. J Am Acad Audiol. 2024. PMID: 39701147
-
Relationships Between Health-Related Quality of Life and Speech Perception in Bimodal and Bilateral Cochlear Implant Users.Front Psychol. 2022 Apr 28;13:859722. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.859722. eCollection 2022. Front Psychol. 2022. PMID: 35572246 Free PMC article.
-
Benefits of Cochlear Implantation in Middle-Aged and Older Adults.Clin Interv Aging. 2020 Sep 7;15:1555-1568. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S255363. eCollection 2020. Clin Interv Aging. 2020. PMID: 32982193 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Gaylor JM, Raman G, Chung M, Lee J, Rao J, Poe DS. Cochlear implantation in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2013; 139:265–272. - PubMed
-
- Brouwer CNM, Maille AR, Rovers MM, et al. Effect of pneumococcal vaccination on quality of life in children with recurrent acute otitis media: a randomized, controlled trial. Pediatrics 2005; 115:273–279. - PubMed
-
- Foteff C, Kennedy S, Milton AH, Deger M, Payk F, Sanderson G. Cost–utility analysis of cochlear implantation in Australian adults. Otol Neurotol 2016; 37(5):454–61. - PubMed
-
- le Roux T, Vinck B, Butler I, Louw L, Nauta L, Schlesinger D, Swanepoel DW. Predictors of health-related quality of life in adult cochlear implant recipients in South Africa. Int J Audiol 2016; 9:1–8. - PubMed
-
- Ramos Á, Guerra-Jiménez G, Rodriguez C, Borkoski S, Falcón JC, Perez D. Cochlear implants in adults over 60: A study of communicative benefits and the impact on quality of life. Cochlear Implants Int 2013; 14. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials