Clinical Significance of US Artifacts
- PMID: 28777700
- DOI: 10.1148/rg.2017160175
Clinical Significance of US Artifacts
Abstract
Artifacts are frequently encountered at clinical US, and while some are unwanted, others may reveal valuable information related to the structure and composition of the underlying tissue. They are essential in making ultrasonography (US) a clinically useful imaging modality but also can lead to errors in image interpretation and can obscure diagnoses. Many of these artifacts can be understood as deviations from the assumptions made in generating the image. Therefore, understanding the physical basis of US image formation is critical to understanding US artifacts and thus proper image interpretation. This review is limited to gray-scale artifacts and is organized into discussions of beam- and resolution-related, location-related (ie, path and speed), and attenuation-related artifacts. Specifically, artifacts discussed include those related to physical mechanisms of spatial resolution, speckle, secondary lobes, reflection and reverberation, refraction, speed of sound, and attenuation. The underlying physical mechanisms and appearances are discussed, followed by real-world strategies to mitigate or accentuate these artifacts, depending on the clinical application. Relatively new US modes, such as spatial compounding, tissue harmonic imaging, and speckle reduction imaging, are now often standard in many imaging protocols; the effects of these modes on US artifacts are discussed. The ability of a radiologist to understand the fundamental physics of ultrasound, recognize common US artifacts, and provide recommendations for altering the imaging technique is essential for proper image interpretation, troubleshooting, and utilization of the full potential of this modality. ©RSNA, 2017.
Similar articles
-
US artifacts.Radiographics. 2009 Jul-Aug;29(4):1179-89. doi: 10.1148/rg.294085199. Radiographics. 2009. PMID: 19605664 Review.
-
Ultrasound artifacts: classification, applied physics with illustrations, and imaging appearances.Ultrasound Q. 2014 Jun;30(2):145-57. doi: 10.1097/RUQ.0b013e3182a80d34. Ultrasound Q. 2014. PMID: 24850030 Review.
-
A Primer on the Physical Principles of Tissue Harmonic Imaging.Radiographics. 2015 Nov-Dec;35(7):1955-64. doi: 10.1148/rg.2015140338. Radiographics. 2015. PMID: 26562232 Review.
-
Artifacts and Technical Considerations at Contrast-enhanced US.Radiographics. 2023 Feb;43(2):e220093. doi: 10.1148/rg.220093. Radiographics. 2023. PMID: 36563094
-
Artifacts in ultrasound imaging.J Ultrasound Med. 1986 Apr;5(4):227-37. doi: 10.7863/jum.1986.5.4.227. J Ultrasound Med. 1986. PMID: 3514956 Review.
Cited by
-
Performing a Basic US Examination: Road Map for Radiology Residents.Radiographics. 2019 Jul-Aug;39(4):1075-1076. doi: 10.1148/rg.2019190008. Radiographics. 2019. PMID: 31283459 Free PMC article.
-
Good and bad boundaries in ultrasound compounding: preserving anatomic boundaries while suppressing artifacts.Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2021 Nov;16(11):1957-1968. doi: 10.1007/s11548-021-02464-4. Epub 2021 Aug 6. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2021. PMID: 34357525 Free PMC article.
-
Ultrasound principles and instrumentation.Surg Open Sci. 2024 Mar 11;18:123-128. doi: 10.1016/j.sopen.2024.02.005. eCollection 2024 Mar. Surg Open Sci. 2024. PMID: 38559744 Free PMC article.
-
Application of a quality threshold to improve liver shear wave elastography measurements in free-breathing pediatric patients.Ultrasonography. 2024 Sep;43(5):354-363. doi: 10.14366/usg.24054. Epub 2024 Jul 7. Ultrasonography. 2024. PMID: 39112092 Free PMC article.
-
The Sonographic Evaluation of Abductor Injury After Intramedullary Nailing for the Hip Fractures.J Clin Med. 2025 Aug 5;14(15):5498. doi: 10.3390/jcm14155498. J Clin Med. 2025. PMID: 40807123 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources