A Differing Opinion on Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients Who Have Had Cancer: Stent Choice in Onco-cardiology Revisited
- PMID: 28778270
- DOI: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2017.05.011
A Differing Opinion on Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients Who Have Had Cancer: Stent Choice in Onco-cardiology Revisited
Comment in
-
In Reply I-A Differing Opinion on Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients Who Have Had Cancer: Stent Choice in Onco-cardiology Revisited.Mayo Clin Proc. 2017 Aug;92(8):1316-1317. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2017.05.013. Mayo Clin Proc. 2017. PMID: 28778271 No abstract available.
-
In Reply II-A Differing Opinion on Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients Who Have Had Cancer: Stent Choice in Onco-cardiology Revisited.Mayo Clin Proc. 2017 Aug;92(8):1317-1318. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2017.05.012. Mayo Clin Proc. 2017. PMID: 28778272 No abstract available.
Comment on
-
Onco-Cardiology: A Tale of Interplay Between 2 Families of Diseases.Mayo Clin Proc. 2016 Dec;91(12):1675-1677. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2016.10.015. Mayo Clin Proc. 2016. PMID: 27916153 No abstract available.
-
Cancer History Portends Worse Acute and Long-term Noncardiac (but Not Cardiac) Mortality After Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction.Mayo Clin Proc. 2016 Dec;91(12):1680-1692. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2016.06.029. Mayo Clin Proc. 2016. PMID: 27916154
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources