Assessing the progression of joint damage in rheumatoid arthritis

Abstract

Joint damage in rheumatoid arthritis can be assessed by plain radiographs of the hands and wrists. There are a number of established methods that give reproducible scores which relate to increasing joint damage by measuring erosions and loss of joint space. Only 3 placebo-controlled trials have shown convincing evidence that gold or cyclophosphamide reduce the rate of progression of joint damage. Most placebo-controlled studies have failed to show a beneficial effect of slow acting antirheumatic drugs on radiological joint damage progression. However, comparative studies or analyses of cohorts of patients taking slow acting antirheumatic drugs show comparable amounts of progression for patients receiving gold and other drugs in this category. In addition, patients who show a clinical response also have less radiological progression after 6 months' therapy. In these circumstances, sulphasalazine produces comparable rates of radiological progression to those produced by gold and penicillamine. There are many problems associated with the use of radiological assessments to determine the progression of rheumatoid arthritis; thus, this method should not be deemed the most important technique by which to measure the success of therapy.