A multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled comparison of nocturnal and twice-a-day famotidine in the treatment of active duodenal ulcer disease
- PMID: 2877912
- DOI: 10.1016/0016-5085(87)90838-9
A multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled comparison of nocturnal and twice-a-day famotidine in the treatment of active duodenal ulcer disease
Abstract
The efficacy and safety of famotidine, a potent new long-acting H2-receptor antagonist, was compared with placebo in a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study in the United States. A total of 384 patients with endoscopically proven acute duodenal ulcer disease were enrolled. Patients received either famotidine or a placebo. The patients receiving famotidine were treated with one of three dose regimens, 40 mg h.s., 40 mg b.i.d., or 20 mg b.i.d. Patients were reassessed by endoscopy at 2, 4, and 8 wk if ulcer healing had not occurred sooner. A diary was kept to record the duration and intensity of the day and night pain and the amount of Gelusil antacid (Parke-Davis, Morris Plains, N.J.) ingested. Three hundred sixty-three patients met the evaluation criteria. The results revealed a 4-wk healing rate of 70%, 75%, 67%, and 31% for the famotidine 40 mg h.s., 40 mg b.i.d., 20 mg b.i.d., and placebo groups, respectively. The 8-wk healing rates for the same respective groups were 83%, 82%, 82%, 45%. Ulcer pain and antacid consumption occurred less often in the famotidine groups. The clinical and laboratory safety profile of the famotidine groups was similar to that of the placebo group. Famotidine appears to be an effective and safe once-a-day therapy for the treatment of acute duodenal ulcer disease. The recommended dosage is 40 mg h.s.
Similar articles
-
A multicenter, randomized, double-blind study comparing famotidine with ranitidine in the treatment of active duodenal ulcer disease.Am J Med. 1986 Oct 24;81(4B):17-24. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(86)90596-6. Am J Med. 1986. PMID: 2877570 Clinical Trial.
-
Famotidine versus cimetidine in the treatment of acute duodenal ulcer. Double-blind, randomized clinical trial comparing nocturnal administration of 40 mg famotidine to 800 mg cimetidine.Digestion. 1988;39(3):156-61. doi: 10.1159/000199620. Digestion. 1988. PMID: 3061859 Clinical Trial.
-
A multicenter, randomized, double-blind study comparing famotidine with cimetidine in the treatment of active duodenal ulcer disease.Digestion. 1989;42(2):86-92. doi: 10.1159/000199830. Digestion. 1989. PMID: 2570005 Clinical Trial.
-
Famotidine in the USA: a review of efficacy studies.J Int Med Res. 1989;17 Suppl 1:17A-24A. J Int Med Res. 1989. PMID: 2566539 Review.
-
Safety profile of long-term H2-antagonist therapy.Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 1991;5 Suppl 1:49-57. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.1991.tb00748.x. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 1991. PMID: 1679672 Review.
Cited by
-
Inhibition of nocturnal acidity is important but not essential for duodenal ulcer healing.Gut. 1990 Apr;31(4):397-400. doi: 10.1136/gut.31.4.397. Gut. 1990. PMID: 2186980 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Histamine H2-receptor antagonists in peptic ulcer disease. Efficacy in healing peptic ulcers.Drugs. 1992 Nov;44(5):709-19. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199244050-00003. Drugs. 1992. PMID: 1280563 Review.
-
Prospective multicentre study of risk factors associated with delayed healing of recurrent duodenal ulcers (RUDER). RUDER Study Group.Gut. 1993 Oct;34(10):1319-26. doi: 10.1136/gut.34.10.1319. Gut. 1993. PMID: 8244095 Free PMC article.
-
Omeprazole versus placebo in duodenal ulcer healing. The United States experience.Dig Dis Sci. 1990 Jan;35(1):66-72. doi: 10.1007/BF01537225. Dig Dis Sci. 1990. PMID: 2403908 Clinical Trial.
-
Peptic ulcer disease. Pathophysiology and current medical management.West J Med. 1987 Jun;146(6):724-33. West J Med. 1987. PMID: 3113079 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous