Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Dec;246(6):1051-1067.
doi: 10.1007/s00425-017-2748-y. Epub 2017 Aug 4.

Floral nectary, nectar production dynamics and chemical composition in five nocturnal Oenothera species (Onagraceae) in relation to floral visitors

Affiliations

Floral nectary, nectar production dynamics and chemical composition in five nocturnal Oenothera species (Onagraceae) in relation to floral visitors

Sebastian Antoń et al. Planta. 2017 Dec.

Abstract

Main conclusion The floral nectars were sucrose-dominant; however, nectar protein and amino acid contents differed, indicating that composition of nitrogenous compounds may vary considerably even between closely related plant species, irrespectively of nectary structure. Numerous zoophilous plants attract their pollinators by offering floral nectar; an aqueous solution produced by specialized secretory tissues, known as floral nectaries. Although many papers on nectaries and nectar already exist, there has been a little research into the structure of nectaries and/or nectar production and composition in species belonging to the same genus. To redress this imbalance, we sought, in the present paper, to describe the floral nectary, nectar production, and nectar composition in five nocturnal Oenothera species with respect to their floral visitors. The structure of nectaries was similar for all the species investigated, and comprised the epidermis (with nectarostomata), numerous layers of nectary parenchyma, and subsecretory parenchyma. Anthesis for a single flower was short (ca. 10-12 h), and flowers lasted only one night. The release of floral nectar commenced at the bud stage (approx. 4 h before anthesis) and nectar was available to pollinators until petal closure. Nectar concentration was relatively low (ca. 27%) and the nectar was sucrose-dominant, and composed mainly of sucrose, glucose and fructose. The protein content of the nectar was also relatively low (on average, 0.31 µg ml-1). Nevertheless, a great variety of amino acids, including both protein and non-protein types, was detected in the nectar profile of the investigated taxa. We noted both diurnal and nocturnal generalist, opportunistic floral insect visitors.

Keywords: Amino acids; Anatomy; Anthesis; Morphology; Pollination syndrome; Protein.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Habit of flower and floral histology of Oenothera rubricaulis. a Inflorescence with pale yellow flower. b Longitudinal section through hypanthium showing floral nectary located basally. c, d Scanning electron micrographs. c Glabrous surface of the internal epidermis of a nectary; note numerous unicellular hairs in the non-secretory area. d Numerous nectarostomata on the nectary surface; some stomata occur in pairs. ei Light photomicrographs. e Transverse section through a hypanthium showing nectary and ground parenchyma with numerous vascular bundles and individual branchysclereids (arrows); methylene blue staining. f Nectary stained by periodic acid-Schiff’s (PAS); note lack of starch grains in secretory cells. g Section of a nectary showing the internal epidermis and nectary parenchyma cells with intensely stained cytoplasm; numerous small intercellular spaces occur between nectary parenchyma cells (arrows); methylene blue staining. h Nectarostomata with relatively large substomatal space (asterisk), auramine O staining. i Chlorophyll in the ground parenchyma autofluorescence red. gp ground parenchyma; i.e., internal epidermis; n nectary, np nectary parenchyma, ph phloem, vb vascular bundles, x xylem. Bars 1 cm (a), 1 mm (b), 500 µm (c), 100 µm (d, e, i), and 20 µm (f, g, h)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Nectar sugar accumulation per flower (mg) throughout flower lifespan in five Oenothera species. Data represent mean values (calculated across 2 study years) ± SD (standard deviation)

References

    1. Adler LS. The ecological significance of toxic nectar. Oikos. 2000;91:409–420. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0706.2000.910301.x. - DOI
    1. Agostini K, Sazima M, Galetto L. Nectar production dynamics and sugar composition in two Mucuna species (Leguminosae, Faboideae) with different specialized pollinators. Naturwissenschaften. 2011;98:933–942. doi: 10.1007/s00114-011-0844-6. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Alm J, Ohnmeiss T, Lanza J, Vriesenga L. Preferences of cabbage white butterflies and honey bees for nectar that contain amino acids. Oecologia. 1990;25:101–113. - PubMed
    1. Antoń S, Denisow B. Nectar production and carbohydrate composition across floral sexual phases: contrasting patterns in two protandrous Aconitum species (Delphinieae, Ranunculaceae) Flora. 2014;209:464–470. doi: 10.1016/j.flora.2014.07.001. - DOI
    1. Antoń S, Kamińska M. Comparative floral spur anatomy and nectar secretion in four representatives of Ranunculaceae. Protoplasma. 2015;252:1587–1601. doi: 10.1007/s00709-015-0794-5. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources