Group and within-group variable selection for competing risks data
- PMID: 28779228
- PMCID: PMC5797529
- DOI: 10.1007/s10985-017-9400-9
Group and within-group variable selection for competing risks data
Abstract
Variable selection in the presence of grouped variables is troublesome for competing risks data: while some recent methods deal with group selection only, simultaneous selection of both groups and within-group variables remains largely unexplored. In this context, we propose an adaptive group bridge method, enabling simultaneous selection both within and between groups, for competing risks data. The adaptive group bridge is applicable to independent and clustered data. It also allows the number of variables to diverge as the sample size increases. We show that our new method possesses excellent asymptotic properties, including variable selection consistency at group and within-group levels. We also show superior performance in simulated and real data sets over several competing approaches, including group bridge, adaptive group lasso, and AIC / BIC-based methods.
Keywords: Adaptive penalty; Clustered data; Competing risks data; Group bridge.
References
-
- Commenges D, Andersen PK. Score test of homogeneity for survival data. Lifetime Data Analysis. 1995;1:145–156. - PubMed
-
- Fan J, Li R. Variable selection for Cox’s proportional hazards model and frailty properties. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 2002;30:74–99.
-
- Fine JP, Gray RJ. A proportional hazards model for the subdistribution of a competing risk. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 1999;94:496–509.
-
- Fu Z. crrp: Penalized Variable Selection in Competing Risks Regression. 2015 URL http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=crrp, r package version 1.0. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Molecular Biology Databases
