Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017;112(2):1111-1121.
doi: 10.1007/s11192-017-2415-x. Epub 2017 May 22.

Normalizing Google Scholar data for use in research evaluation

John Mingers  1 , Martin Meyer  1
Affiliations

Normalizing Google Scholar data for use in research evaluation

John Mingers et al. Scientometrics. 2017.

Abstract

Using bibliometric data for the evaluation of the research of institutions and individuals is becoming increasingly common. Bibliometric evaluations across disciplines require that the data be normalized to the field because the fields are very different in their citation processes. Generally, the major bibliographic databases such as Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus are used for this but they have the disadvantage of limited coverage in the social science and humanities. Coverage in Google Scholar (GS) is much better but GS has less reliable data and fewer bibliometric tools. This paper tests a method for GS normalization developed by Bornmann et al. (J Assoc Inf Sci Technol 67:2778-2789, 2016) on an alternative set of data involving journal papers, book chapters and conference papers. The results show that GS normalization is possible although at the moment it requires extensive manual involvement in generating and validating the data. A comparison of the normalized results for journal papers with WoS data shows a high degree of convergent validity.

Keywords: Google Scholar; Normalization; Research evaluation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Scattergram of WoS JNCS against GS JNCS with linear regression line
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Adriaanse L, Rensleigh C. Web of science, scopus and Google Scholar. The Electronic Library. 2013;31(6):727–744. doi: 10.1108/EL-12-2011-0174. - DOI
    1. Amara N, Landry R. Counting citations in the field of business and management: Why use Google Scholar rather than the web of science. Scientometrics. 2012;93(3):553–581. doi: 10.1007/s11192-012-0729-2. - DOI
    1. Bornmann L, Haunschild R. Citation score normalized by cited references (CSNCR): The introduction of a new citation impact indicator. Journal of Informetrics. 2016;10(3):875–887. doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2016.07.002. - DOI
    1. Bornmann L, Marx W. Methods for the generation of normalized citation impact scores in bibliometrics: Which method best reflects the judgements of experts? Journal of Informetrics. 2015;9(2):408–418. doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2015.01.006. - DOI
    1. Bornmann L, Thor A, Marx W, Schier H. The application of bibliometrics to research evaluation in the humanities and social sciences: An exploratory study using normalized Google Scholar data for the publications of a research institute. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 2016;67:2778–2789. doi: 10.1002/asi.23627. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources