Ovarian conservation vs removal at the time of benign hysterectomy
- PMID: 28784419
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.07.037
Ovarian conservation vs removal at the time of benign hysterectomy
Abstract
Over the last 2 decades, the rate of oophorectomy at the time of hysterectomy in the United States has consistently been between 40-50%. A decline in hormone use has been observed since the release of the principal results of the Women's Health Initiative. Oophorectomy appears to be associated with an increased risk of coronary heart disease, as well as deleterious effects on overall mortality, cognitive functioning, and sexual functioning. Estrogen deficiency from surgical menopause is associated with bone mineral density loss and increased fracture risk. While hormone therapy may mitigate these effects, at no age does there appear to be a survival benefit associated with oophorectomy. Reduction of ovarian cancer risk may be accomplished with salpingectomy at the time of hysterectomy.
Keywords: morbidity; mortality; oophorectomy; ovarian cancer; ovarian conservation.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Reply.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Nov;219(5):507-508. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.05.023. Epub 2018 May 28. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018. PMID: 29852157 No abstract available.
-
Removing ovaries at hysterectomy.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Nov;219(5):506-507. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.05.024. Epub 2018 May 28. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018. PMID: 29852161 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
