Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Aug 7;7(1):7390.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-07713-8.

Carriage frequency, phenotypic, and genotypic characteristics of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolated from dental health-care personnel, patients, and environment

Affiliations

Carriage frequency, phenotypic, and genotypic characteristics of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolated from dental health-care personnel, patients, and environment

Ahmed S Khairalla et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

There is limited data on methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) carriage in dental clinics. 1300 specimens from patients, health personnel, and environmental surfaces of a dental clinic in Egypt were tested for MRSA. Antibiotic susceptibility, biofilm formation, Staphylococcal protein A (spa) typing, SCCmec typing, and PCR-based assays were used to detect mecA, mecC, vanA, Panton-Valentine Leukocidin toxin (PVL), and toxic shock syndrome toxin-1 (tst) genes. Among 34 mecA-positive MRSA isolates, five (14.7%) were PVL-positive, seventeen (50%) were tst-positive, ten (29.4%) were vanA-positive, while none harboured mecC. MRSA hand carriage rates in patients, nurses, and dentists were 9.8%, 6.6%, and 5%. The respective nasal colonization rates were 11.1%, 6.7%, and 9.7%. 1.3% of the environmental isolates were MRSA-positive. Strong and moderate biofilm-forming isolates represented 23.5% and 29.4% of MRSA isolates. 24 MRSA isolates (70.6%) were multi-resistant and 18 (52.9%) harboured SCCmec IV. Among eight spa types, t223 (26.5%), t267 (23.5%), and t14339 (23.5%) were predominant. We noted an alarming genetic relatedness between 7 (20.6%) MRSA isolates and the epidemic EMRSA-15 clone, as well as a combined occurrence of tst and PVL in 3 (8.8%) isolates. Results suggest high MRSA pathogenicity in dental wards highlighting the need for more efficient surveillance/infection control strategies.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Population structure of the tested MRSA isolates (n = 34) based on BURP analysis. This analysis was performed using the Based Upon Repeat Pattern (BURP) algorithm of the Ridom StaphType software (Ridom GmbH, Würzburg, Germany) at a cost setting of ≤ 5 and excluding spa-types with 5 or fewer repeats. Each dot represents a different spa type, with the diameter of the dot being proportional to the quantity of the corresponding spa type. Clusters of linked spa types correspond to spa clonal complexes (spa-CCs). The predict founder of a cluster (which was used for defining the cluster) is shown in blue, while the others in black. Near the lines of connection, the mutations involved in the transition from a spa type to the next one are reported in detail. All DNA changes are meant to occur from the founder to the periphery. Legend: numbers along the lines refer to the repeat sequence involved in the mutation; +indicates the acquisition of a repeat sequence; - indicates the loss of a repeat sequence; within circles the numbers of the strains of each CC appear between brackets. In summary, the analysis identified a single clonal complex (spa-CC223) comprising spa types t223, t14339, t3689, and t8506; n = 20 isolates, and accounted for 58.8% of all tested MRSA isolates, as well as 3 singletons (t267, t084, and t1339; n = 12 isolates, 35.2%), while excluded 2 isolates (t380, 5.8%) from the clustering, as they consisted of four repeat units only.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Biofilm-forming abilities of the tested MRSA isolates in relation to the specimen source.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Stefani S, Goglio A. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: related infections and antibiotic resistance. Int J Infect Dis. 2010;14(Suppl 4):S19–22. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2010.05.009. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Grundmann H, Aires-de-Sousa M, Boyce J, Tiemersma E. Emergence and resurgence of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus as a public-health threat. The Lancet. 2006;368:874–885. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68853-3. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Liu GY. Molecular pathogenesis of Staphylococcus aureus infection. Pediatr Res. 2009;65:71R–77R. doi: 10.1203/PDR.0b013e31819dc44d. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wyllie D, Paul J, Crook D. Waves of trouble: MRSA strain dynamics and assessment of the impact of infection control. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2011;66:2685–2688. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkr392. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Aucken HM, Ganner M, Murchan S, Cookson BD, Johnson AP. A new UK strain of epidemic methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (EMRSA-17) resistant to multiple antibiotics. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2002;50:171–175. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkf117. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms

Substances