Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jul:43:207-227.
doi: 10.1146/annurev-soc-060116-053622. Epub 2017 May 12.

Decision-Making Processes in Social Contexts

Affiliations

Decision-Making Processes in Social Contexts

Elizabeth Bruch et al. Annu Rev Sociol. 2017 Jul.

Abstract

Over the past half-century, scholars in the interdisciplinary field of Judgment and Decision Making have amassed a trove of findings, theories, and prescriptions regarding the processes ordinary people enact when making choices. But this body of knowledge has had little influence on sociology. Sociological research on choice emphasizes how features of the social environment shape individual behavior, not people's underlying decision processes. Our aim in this article is to provide an overview of selected ideas, models, and data sources from decision research that can fuel new lines of inquiry on how socially situated actors navigate both everyday and major life choices. We also highlight opportunities and challenges for cross-fertilization between sociology and decision research that can allow the methods, findings, and contexts of each field to expand their joint range of inquiry.

Keywords: decision making; discrete choice; heuristics; micro-sociology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Alba J, Marmorstein H. The effects of frequency knowledge on consumer decision making. Journal of Consumer Research. 1987;14:14–25.
    1. Alhakami A, Slovic P. A psychological study of the inverse relationship between perceived risk and perceived benefit. Risk analysis. 1994;14:1085–1096. - PubMed
    1. Aribarg A, Arora N, Bodur H. Understanding the role of preference revision and concession in group decisions. Journal of Marketing Research. 2002;39:336–349.
    1. Astone N, McLanahan S. Family structure, parental practices and high school completion. American Sociological Review. 1991;56:309–320.
    1. Baker W. The social structure of a national securities market. American Journal of Sociology. 1984;89:775–811.

LinkOut - more resources