Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017;36(3):75-90.
doi: 10.12938/bmfh.16-030. Epub 2017 Apr 29.

Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli and probiotics in swine: what the bleep do we know?

Affiliations
Review

Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli and probiotics in swine: what the bleep do we know?

Jean Daniel Dubreuil. Biosci Microbiota Food Health. 2017.

Abstract

The concept of certain microorganisms conferring direct benefits to the host relates to the term "probiotic". Probiotics are microorganisms, bacteria, or yeast that when administered orally in sufficient quantity can counteract the effect of pathogenic microorganisms. The gastrointestinal (GI) tract is the site where probiotics are believed to play the most important role. The proposed effects of probiotics include antagonism of pathogens, interference with adherence, competition for nutrients, enterotoxin inactivation, modulation of the immune response, and strengthening of the intestinal barrier. From birth to postweaning, piglets are very sensitive to gut colonisation by pathogens. Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli represents one of the most common agents of swine diarrhoea. The enterotoxins produced by this E. coli virotype are responsible for the loss of electrolytes and water observed following infection. This review addresses more specifically the studies done during the last 10 years deciphering the molecular mechanisms at play between host cell and probiotic interactions in the swine GI tract.

Keywords: barrier function; diarrhoea; inflammation; pig; probiotic; tight junction.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Metchnikoff E.1907. Quelques remarques sur le lait aigri. Rev. Gen. Chimie pure et appliquée: 77−85.
    1. Chaucheyras-Durand F, Durand H. 2010. Probiotics in animal nutrition and health. Benef Microbes 1: 3–9. - PubMed
    1. Schroeder B, Duncker S, Barth S, Bauerfeind R, Gruber AD, Deppenmeier S, Breves G. 2006. Preventive effects of the probiotic Escherichia coli strain Nissle 1917 on acute secretory diarrhea in a pig model of intestinal infection. Dig Dis Sci 51: 724–731. - PubMed
    1. Rajilić-Stojanović M, Heilig HGH, Tims S, Zoetendal EG, de Vos WM. 2012. Long-term monitoring of the human intestinal microbiota composition. Environ Microbiol 15: 1146–1159. - PubMed
    1. Bailey M. 2009. The mucosal immune system: recent developments and future directions in the pig. Dev Comp Immunol 33: 375–383. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources