Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Feb;27(1):177-186.
doi: 10.1007/s10897-017-0135-2. Epub 2017 Aug 7.

Cancer Genetic Counseling and Testing: Perspectives of Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Patients and Gynecologic Oncology Healthcare Providers

Affiliations

Cancer Genetic Counseling and Testing: Perspectives of Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Patients and Gynecologic Oncology Healthcare Providers

Margaret I Liang et al. J Genet Couns. 2018 Feb.

Abstract

Multi-gene panel testing has expanded the genetic information available to cancer patients. The objective was to assess provider behaviors and attitudes and patient knowledge and attitudes towards genetic counseling and testing. An online survey was distributed to Society of Gynecologic Oncology members and a written questionnaire was administered to patients diagnosed with epithelial ovarian cancer at a tertiary care referral center. Most of the 233 (18% response rate) provider respondents were gynecologic oncologists. Access to a genetic counselor was reported by 87% of providers and 55% deferred all testing to genetic counselors. Of 53 ovarian cancer patient respondents, two-thirds had previously seen a genetic counselor or undergone testing. Patients' attitudes about genetic counseling and/or testing were favorable with respect to themselves (70-81%) and their family members (94%). Less than 25% of patients indicated worrying about health care discrimination, lack of privacy, or high cost. Seventy-seven percent of patients demonstrated a desire to obtain genetic information even if the results were not currently actionable, and 20% of providers stated they test for only those genes with guideline-supported actionable results. Provider practice differences were identified in screening and prevention strategies for patients with deleterious non-BRCA mutations and variants of uncertain significance. The variation in clinical interpretation of results associated with poorly defined cancer risks signals a need for more comprehensive training and guidelines to ensure access to evidence-based care.

Keywords: Genetic counseling; Genetic testing; Moderate penetrance gene; Ovarian cancer; Panel testing; Variant of uncertain significance.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Nat Genet. 2011 Oct 02;43(11):1104-7 - PubMed
    1. Genet Med. 2011 Dec;13(12):1045-50 - PubMed
    1. JAMA. 2010 Sep 1;304(9):967-75 - PubMed
    1. JAMA. 2006 Jul 12;296(2):185-92 - PubMed
    1. Br J Cancer. 2006 Mar 27;94(6):814-9 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources