Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Aug 17;53(67):9372-9375.
doi: 10.1039/c7cc05379g.

Computationally-guided optimization of small-molecule inhibitors of the Aurora A kinase-TPX2 protein-protein interaction

Affiliations

Computationally-guided optimization of small-molecule inhibitors of the Aurora A kinase-TPX2 protein-protein interaction

Daniel J Cole et al. Chem Commun (Camb). .

Abstract

Free energy perturbation theory, in combination with enhanced sampling of protein-ligand binding modes, is evaluated in the context of fragment-based drug design, and used to design two new small-molecule inhibitors of the Aurora A kinase-TPX2 protein-protein interaction.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Crystal structure of AurkinA (compound 13) bound to Aurora A kinase. Flexible torsional angles in the ligand (φ) and L178 on the protein (χ) are shown in red.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. Examples of structures sampled during MC/FEP simulations of compound 2 bound to Aurora A. (a) φ = 180°, χ = 180°, (b) φ = 330°, χ = 180°, (c) φ = 180°, χ = 60°.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. Dihedral angle distributions from Monte Carlo simulations for both the phenyl ring of compounds 2 and 5 (φ) and the side chain of L178 (χ). Assigned dihedral angles from X-ray crystal structures are displayed as vertical dashed lines.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4. Additional MC/FEP relative free energies of binding (kcal mol–1) and experimental results where available.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5. Correlation between computed and experimental (= RT ln(IC50)) binding free energies. Computational results are offset to give the same mean as the experimental distribution.

References

    1. Andrews P. D. Oncogene. 2005;24:5005–5015. - PubMed
    1. Carmena M., Earnshaw W. C. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2003;4:842–854. - PubMed
    1. Dieterich K., Soto Rifo R., Faure A. K., Hennebicq S., Ben Amar B., Zahi M., Perrin J., Martinez D., Sele B., Jouk P.-S., Ohlmann T., Rousseaux S., Lunardi J., Ray P. F. Nat. Genet. 2007;39:661–665. - PubMed
    1. Cowley D. O., Rivera-Perez J. A., Schliekelman M., He Y. J., Oliver T. G., Lu L., O’Quinn R., Salmon E. D., Magnuson T., Van Dyke T. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2009;29:1059–1071. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Macurek L., Lindqvist A., Lim D., Lampson M. A., Klompmaker R., Freire R., Clouin C., Taylor S. S., Yaffe M. B., Medema R. H. Nature. 2008;455:119–123. - PubMed

MeSH terms