Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2014 Jan 28;7(2):805-875.
doi: 10.3390/ma7020805.

Fabrications and Applications of Stimulus-Responsive Polymer Films and Patterns on Surfaces: A Review

Affiliations
Review

Fabrications and Applications of Stimulus-Responsive Polymer Films and Patterns on Surfaces: A Review

Jem-Kun Chen et al. Materials (Basel). .

Abstract

In the past two decades, we have witnessed significant progress in developing high performance stimuli-responsive polymeric materials. This review focuses on recent developments in the preparation and application of patterned stimuli-responsive polymers, including thermoresponsive layers, pH/ionic-responsive hydrogels, photo-responsive film, magnetically-responsive composites, electroactive composites, and solvent-responsive composites. Many important new applications for stimuli-responsive polymers lie in the field of nano- and micro-fabrication, where stimuli-responsive polymers are being established as important manipulation tools. Some techniques have been developed to selectively position organic molecules and then to obtain well-defined patterned substrates at the micrometer or submicrometer scale. Methods for patterning of stimuli-responsive hydrogels, including photolithography, electron beam lithography, scanning probe writing, and printing techniques (microcontact printing, ink-jet printing) were surveyed. We also surveyed the applications of nanostructured stimuli-responsive hydrogels, such as biotechnology (biological interfaces and purification of biomacromoles), switchable wettability, sensors (optical sensors, biosensors, chemical sensors), and actuators.

Keywords: magnetically-responsive; pH-responsive; photo-responsive; polymer; thermoresponsive.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
(a) Poly(Nisopropylacrylamide) (PNIPAAm); (b) poly(N,N-diethylaminoethyl methacrylate) (PDEAEMA); (c) poly(N,N′-diethylacrylamide) (PDEAAm); (d) poly(2-carboxyisopropylacrylamide) (PCIPAAm); (e) poly[2-(methacryloyloxy)ethyl]-dimethyl(3-sulfopropyl) ammonium hydroxide (PMEDSAH). Reprinted (adapted) with permission from [,–33,35].
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Representation of the supramolecular structure formed from the complexation of PNIPAAm and adenine through a nucleobase-like hydrogen bonding (NLHB) interactions. Reprinted (adapted) with permission from [51].
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
(a) Poly(acrylic acid) (PAAc); (b) poly(methacrylic acid) (PMAAc); (c) poly(N,N′-diethyl aminoethyl methacrylate) (PDEAEMA); (d) Poly(4-vinylpyridine) (P4VP); (e) Poly(vinyl imidazole) (PVI); (f) poly[2-(methacryloyloxy)- ethyltrimethylammonium chloride] (PMETAC).
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Schematic illustrations of reversible photoisomerization. (a) photoisomerization of azobenzene groups; (b) isomeric molecular structure of a spiropyran irradiated with light, spiropyran (left), merocyanine (center), and quinoidal canonical form (right); (c) photodimerization of the cinnamic acid group. Reprinted (adapted) with permission from [74,78,82].
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
(a) Reconstructed image of a cicada (a familiar insect in Taiwan) standing on the cross section of a branch written in the PANPAC/TDI film; (b) overwritten image of four portraits; (c) dark decay after 1 h; (d) same image as in part a written in the PANTAC/TDI film; (e) chemical structure of the polymer. Reprinted (adapted) with permission from [84]. Copyright (1999) American Chemical Society.
Figure 6.
Figure 6.
Schematic illustration for the synthesis of a wire-like assembly of magnetic nanoparticles inside a cylindrical polymer brush. (a) polymer brush with PAA core and PnBA shell; (b) neutralized polymer brush with poly(sodium acrylate) core (Na+ ions are not shown); (c) polychelate of the brush with Fe2+ or Fe3+ ions; and (d) hybrid nanocylinder of the brush and magnetic nanoparticles. Reprinted (adapted) with permission from [10].
Figure 7.
Figure 7.
(a) A schematic representation of the controlled dispersed structures of the tubes within the polymer matrix; (b) thermomechanical properties curves (200% elongation at 50 °C); and (c) shape recovery and shape retention (quenching/unloading and subsequently applying an electric voltage of 40 V) for the polyurethane composites prepared by conventional blending, in situ, and cross-linking polymerization. Reproduced from Reference [104] with permission.
Figure 8.
Figure 8.
(a) Schematic illustrations of reversible poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) brush treated with good and poor solvents; (b) Atomic force microscopy (AFM) images of densely patterned lines polystyrene (PS) brushes (1:1 duty ratio, 160 nm resolution) before and after good (left) and poor (right) solvent treatments, respectively; (c) Schematic of a polymeric sensor based on a surface-grafted polymer layer with AuNPs, adsorbed on a stimuli-responsive polymer line pattern grafted onto a silicon substrate. The AuNPs-surface distance depends on the conformation of the polymer chains and changes in different solvents. The change in height is therefore reported by a variation in the detected diffractive intensity. Reprinted from Reference [108,110,114] with permission.
Figure 9.
Figure 9.
(a) Synthetic route toward poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) (PHEMA) brushes patterned through advanced lithography, and ATRP on Si wafers; (b) 3D, cross-section, and profile AFM image of line patterned PHEMA brushes with 350 nm of resolution. Reprinted from Reference [119,120] with permission.
Figure 10.
Figure 10.
Irradiation through a mask, conversion of the terminal nitro group in amine group and diazotization and coupling with malonodinitrile gives a SAM that bears an asymmetric azo-initiator. Reprinted from Reference [128] with permission.
Figure 11.
Figure 11.
(a) Schematic representation of the dip-pen nanolithography (DPN) process. A water meniscus forms between the AFM tip which is coated with “ink” molecules and the solid substrate; (b) Preparation of polymer brushes grafted from immobilized precursors on gold nanowires. Reproduced with permission from reference [139]; Reprinted from Reference [135,139] with permission.
Figure 12.
Figure 12.
Schematic comparison of photolithography vs. microcontact printing (μCP). The crucial step in both techniques consists of the accurate transfer of the patterned etch-resist layer. Reprinted from Reference [150] with permission.
Figure 13.
Figure 13.
Outline procedure for grafting multiple patterned polymer brushes and ATRP passivation. Reprinted from Reference [156] with permission.
Figure 14.
Figure 14.
Schematic of the process for capture and release specific DNA by a tethered poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) (PNIPAAm) in the channel surface of a fluid device from a specimen with lysed human blood cells. Reprinted from Reference [181] with permission.
Figure 15.
Figure 15.
(a) Schematic representation of the capture and release of specific gDNA from a specimen of lysed human blood cells by tethered Poly[2-(dimethylamino)-ethyl methacrylate] (PDMAEMA) on an Si surface [200]; (b) Optical microscope image of the fluidic system with the straight channels. Reprinted from Reference [178] with permission.
Figure 16.
Figure 16.
Schematic representation of the strategy for ferritin capture. (I) The sample surface presenting the patterned PHEMA brushes is immersed for 1 h into a mixture of water and MeOH containing dispersed ferritin; (II) The sample surface is immersed into n-hexane to transform it from a brush-like to a mushroom-like structure, with the OH groups of the PHEMA brushes becoming buried within the PHEMA thin film to form hydrophilic domains; (III) The ferritin species on the PHEMA thin film surface are removed through degradation of the protein sheath under O2 in an oven at ca. 500 °C to observe the ferrihydrite cores. Reprinted from Reference [204] with permission.
Figure 17.
Figure 17.
(a) Schematic representation of the process used to fabricate chemically nanopatterned surfaces of PS-b-PNIPAAm brushes; (b) Reversible Hydrophobic/Hydrophilic adhesive of PS-b-PNIPAAm copolymer brush nanopillar arrays for mimicking the climbing aptitude of geckos. Reprinted from Reference [223] with permission.
Figure 18.
Figure 18.
Schematic representation of the PNIPAm-grafted pore-array with different PNIPAm layer thickness, AFM images and thermally responsive wettability induced water droplet profile changes at two different temperatures of (a) ZnO pore-array and PNIPAm-grafted (b) S1; (c) S2; and (d) S3 substrates. Reprinted from Reference [231] with permission.
Figure 19.
Figure 19.
(a) Cross section profile of a one-dimensional periodic subwavelength grating; (b) One-dimensional periodic subwavelength gratings; (c) Symmetric two-dimensional subwavelength relief gratings; symmetric two-dimensional subwavelength concave gratings. Reprinted from Reference [232] with permission.
Figure 20.
Figure 20.
(a) Geometrical parameters and/or refractive index contrast of a 2DPCG typically change with the temperature resulting color change [238]; (b) neff response and calculated filling factor of 2DPRG of tethered PMMA layer as a function of solvent species for volatile organic compounds (VOC) exposing in the order of chloroform (A); 1,2-dichloroethane (DCE) (B); dioxane (C); toluene (D); tetrahydrofuran (THF) (E); cyclohexane (F); acetone (G); and in dry state (H). Photographic images demonstrate the grating effect of the 2DPRG under VOC exposing of chloroform, dioxane, THF, and acetone, from left to right. Reprinted from Reference [239] with permission.
Figure 21.
Figure 21.
(a) Spectroscopic characterization of the porous gel. Photographs and reflection spectra of the porous poly(NIPA-co-AAB) gel in the dark at various temperatures; (b) Multicolor photochromic behavior of the porous gel. Photographs and reflection spectra of the porous poly(NIPA-co-AAB) gel in water at 19, 21, and 24 °C before UV irradiation and after the equilibrium degree of swelling had been reached in response to the UV irradiation (366 nm, 8.0 m·W·cm−2). Reprinted from Reference [241] with permission.
Figure 22.
Figure 22.
(a) Schematic representation of the process used to fabricate the MAHA-modified NPLA. (A) Silicon oxide film was deposited through plasma-enhanced chemical vapordeposition; the surface was then treated with HMDS in a thermal evaporator; (B) Negative photoresist was spun onto the HMDS-treated surface to pattern the photoresistas a 200-nm-scale NPLA; (C) Only the exposed regions of silicon dioxide were dry-etched by supplying a mixture gas of CHF3and CF4; the remaining photoresist hard maskwas then removed from the surface through the action of solvents; (D) The NPLA of silicon oxide was treated with APTES to assemble an array of amino groups; (E) The NPLApresenting amino groups was treated with a solution of EDC and NHS to immobilize proG on the pillar surfaces; MAHA units were oriented on the proG-modified pillarsurface; the presence of MHHA could be detected through ellipsometry [261]; (b) Values of neff, measured using ellipsometry, of (A) bare 2DPRG; (B) proG-2DPRG; (C) MAHA-modified 2DPRG; (D) MAHA-modified 2DPRG after coupling with MHHA; and (E) MAHA-modified 2DPRG after binding BSA (control). Photographic images for (A)–(C) and (D) demonstrate the grating effect of the 2DPRG. Reprinted from Reference [262] with permission.
Figure 22.
Figure 22.
(a) Schematic representation of the process used to fabricate the MAHA-modified NPLA. (A) Silicon oxide film was deposited through plasma-enhanced chemical vapordeposition; the surface was then treated with HMDS in a thermal evaporator; (B) Negative photoresist was spun onto the HMDS-treated surface to pattern the photoresistas a 200-nm-scale NPLA; (C) Only the exposed regions of silicon dioxide were dry-etched by supplying a mixture gas of CHF3and CF4; the remaining photoresist hard maskwas then removed from the surface through the action of solvents; (D) The NPLA of silicon oxide was treated with APTES to assemble an array of amino groups; (E) The NPLApresenting amino groups was treated with a solution of EDC and NHS to immobilize proG on the pillar surfaces; MAHA units were oriented on the proG-modified pillarsurface; the presence of MHHA could be detected through ellipsometry [261]; (b) Values of neff, measured using ellipsometry, of (A) bare 2DPRG; (B) proG-2DPRG; (C) MAHA-modified 2DPRG; (D) MAHA-modified 2DPRG after coupling with MHHA; and (E) MAHA-modified 2DPRG after binding BSA (control). Photographic images for (A)–(C) and (D) demonstrate the grating effect of the 2DPRG. Reprinted from Reference [262] with permission.
Figure 23.
Figure 23.
Confocal images demonstrating the release of rhodamine 6G from the polymer-grafted particles at 50 °C: (A) at t = 0 min; (B) at t = 7 min; (C) Fluorescence intensity line profiles taken from the horizontal midline of the image of the particle as a function of time. Reprinted from Reference [267] with permission.
Figure 24.
Figure 24.
Images of the repeated bending and stretching motion of the poly[NIPAAm-co-Ru(bpy)3-co-AMPS] gel strip (R10-A3) in the mixture solution of the BZ substrates. First, the whole gel strip was homogeneous reduced state. Second, the gel strip is in a locally oxidized state when the chemical wave propagates in the gel from one edge to the other edge (1 → 4). Finally, the whole gel strip change reduced state, and was bending (5 → 6). Reprinted from Reference [284] with permission.
Figure 25.
Figure 25.
Schematic design of a hydrogel-based microvalve: 1, inlet; 2, outlet; 3, flow channel; 4, actuator chamber filled with hydrogel particles; 5, structure layer; 6, heating meander (located at backside); 7, circuit card; 8, temperature sensor (located at topside); (a) closed state at room temperature; (b) open state (gel actuator is heated above TC). Reprinted from Reference [199] with permission.

References

    1. Deshmukh P.K., Ramani K.P., Singh S.S., Tekade A.R., Chatap V.K., Patil G.B., Bari S.B. Stimuli-sensitive layer-by-layer (LbL) self-assembly systems: Targeting and biosensory applications. J. Control. Release. 2013;166:94–306. - PubMed
    1. Kikuchi A., Okano T. Intelligent thermoresponsive polymeric stationary phases for aqueous chromatography of biological compounds. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2002;27:1165–1193.
    1. Ware T., Simon D., Rennaker R.L., Voit W. Smart polymers for neural interfaces. Polym. Rev. 2013;53:108–129.
    1. Hamner K.L., Alexander C.M., Coopersmith K., Reishofer D., Provenza C., Maye M.M. Using temperature-sensitive smart polymers to regulate DNA-mediated nanoassembly and encoded nanocarrier drug release. ACS Nano. 2013;7:7011–7020. - PubMed
    1. Qiu Y., Park K. Environment-sensitive hydrogels for drug delivery. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2001;53:321–339. - PubMed