The Relative Merits of Cemented and Uncemented Prostheses in Total Hip Arthroplasty
- PMID: 28790466
- PMCID: PMC5525518
- DOI: 10.4103/ortho.IJOrtho_405_16
The Relative Merits of Cemented and Uncemented Prostheses in Total Hip Arthroplasty
Abstract
The results of modern cemented and uncemented total hip arthroplasties are outstanding and both systems have their advantages and disadvantages. This paper aims to examine the designs of different types of prostheses, some history behind their development and the reported results. Particular emphasis is placed on cemented stem design and the details of cementing technique.
Keywords: Arthroplasty; Cemented stem; bone cements; hip; joint; prostheses; prosthesis; replacement; total hip arthroplasty; uncemented stem.
Conflict of interest statement
The senior author receives royalties from Stryker Corporation, Mahwah, NJ, USA
Figures
References
-
- Thanner J. The acetabular component in total hip arthroplasty. Evaluation of different fixation principles. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl. 1999;286:1–41. - PubMed
-
- Davies N, Jackson W, Price A, Rees J, Lavy C. FRCS Trauma and Orthopaedics Viva. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012.
-
- Khanuja HS, Vakil JJ, Goddard MS, Mont MA. Cementless femoral fixation in total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011;93:500–9. - PubMed
-
- Castelli CC, Rizzi L. Short stems in total hip replacement: Current status and future. Hip Int. 2014;24(Suppl 10):S25–8. - PubMed
-
- Galante J, Rostoker W, Lueck R, Ray RD. Sintered fiber metal composites as a basis for attachment of implants to bone. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1971;53:101–14. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources