Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Editorial
. 2017 Jun 17:4:3.
doi: 10.1186/s40814-017-0151-x. eCollection 2018.

Raising the profile of pilot and feasibility studies in relation to the development, evaluation and implementation of patient-reported outcome measures

Affiliations
Editorial

Raising the profile of pilot and feasibility studies in relation to the development, evaluation and implementation of patient-reported outcome measures

Georgina Jones. Pilot Feasibility Stud. .

Erratum in

  • Erratum to: Pilot and Feasibility Studies, Vol. 4.
    Pilot and Feasibility Studies. Pilot and Feasibility Studies. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2017 Oct 24;3:48. doi: 10.1186/s40814-017-0183-2. eCollection 2017. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2017. PMID: 29123916 Free PMC article.

Abstract

This editorial introduces a new special series on the pilot and feasibility testing of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in the on-line open access journal Pilot and Feasibility Studies. Pilot and feasibility studies are typically implemented to address issues of uncertainty before undertaking a larger definitive study such as a randomised controlled trial or large scale survey. This editorial considers the role that such pilot and feasibility testing plays in relation to the development, evaluation and implementation of PROMs. This is often an essential element of PROM research but is typically overlooked-especially within current methodological guidance, reporting space and also debate. This editorial aims to open up a dialogue about the role of pilot and feasibility testing in relation to PROMs. It highlights some of the areas in PROMs research where these types of studies have been carried out and discusses the ways in which the PROM community may be better supported and encouraged to integrate this element of the research process into their PROM-based work.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Albrecht GL. Subjective health assessment. In: Jenkinson C, editor. Measuring health and medical outcomes. London: UCL Press; 1994. pp. 7–26.
    1. World Health Organisation . The first ten years of the world health. London: World Health Organisation; 1958.
    1. Jenkinson C. Assessment and evaluation of health and medical care: an introduction and overview. In: Jenkinson C, editor. Assessment and evaluation of health and medical care: a methods text. Buckingham: Open University Press; 1997. pp. 1–5.
    1. Wigton RS. Medical applications. In: Brehmer B, Joyce CRB, editors. s. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 1988. pp. 227–45.
    1. White-Koning M, Grandjean H, Colver A, Arnaud C. Parent and professional reports of the quality of life of children with cerebral palsy and associated intellectual impairment. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2008;50(8):618–24. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2008.03026.x. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources