Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2017 Aug 9;12(8):e0178212.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178212. eCollection 2017.

The impact of the implementation of physician assistants in inpatient care: A multicenter matched-controlled study

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

The impact of the implementation of physician assistants in inpatient care: A multicenter matched-controlled study

Marijke J C Timmermans et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Background: Medical care for admitted patients in hospitals is increasingly reallocated to physician assistants (PAs). There is limited evidence about the consequences for the quality and safety of care. This study aimed to determine the effects of substitution of inpatient care from medical doctors (MDs) to PAs on patients' length of stay (LOS), quality and safety of care, and patient experiences with the provided care.

Methods: In a multicenter matched-controlled study, the traditional model in which only MDs are employed for inpatient care (MD model) was compared with a mixed model in which besides MDs also PAs are employed (PA/MD model). Thirty-four wards were recruited across the Netherlands. Patients were followed from admission till one month after discharge. Primary outcome measure was patients' LOS. Secondary outcomes concerned eleven indicators for quality and safety of inpatient care and patients' experiences with the provided care.

Results: Data on 2,307 patients from 34 hospital wards was available. The involvement of PAs was not significantly associated with LOS (β 1.20, 95%CI 0.99-1.40, p = .062). None of the indicators for quality and safety of care were different between study arms. However, the involvement of PAs was associated with better experiences of patients (β 0.49, 95% CI 0.22-0.76, p = .001).

Conclusions: This study did not find differences regarding LOS and quality of care between wards on which PAs, in collaboration with MDs, provided medical care for the admitted patients, and wards on which only MDs provided medical care. Employing PAs seems to be safe and seems to lead to better patient experiences.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01835444.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Flow-chart of patients.

References

    1. Ford WT, Britting LL. Nonphysician providers in the hospitalist model: a prescription for change and a warning about unintended side effects. J Hosp Med 2010, 5(2):99–102. doi: 10.1002/jhm.556 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hartsell Z. The emerging role of PAs in the hospitalist movement. JAAPA 2007, 20(8):10 - PubMed
    1. Mittman DE, Cawley JF, Fenn WH. Physician assistants in the United States. BMJ 2002, 325(7362):485–487. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Merkle F, Ritsema TS, Bauer S, Kuilman L. The physician assistant: Shifting the Paradigm of European medical practice? HSR Proc Intensive Care Cardiovasc Anesth 2011, 3(4):255–262. - PMC - PubMed
    1. van Walraven C, Oake N, Jennings A, Forster AJ. The association between continuity of care and outcomes: a systematic and critical review. J Eval Clin Pract 2010, 16(5):947–956. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2009.01235.x - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data