A randomized controlled trial of ampicillin plus sulbactam vs. gentamicin plus clindamycin in the treatment of intraabdominal infections: a preliminary report. Study Group of Intraabdominal Infections
- PMID: 2879345
A randomized controlled trial of ampicillin plus sulbactam vs. gentamicin plus clindamycin in the treatment of intraabdominal infections: a preliminary report. Study Group of Intraabdominal Infections
Abstract
This is a preliminary report of a comparative study of sulbactam plus ampicillin (sulbactam/ampicillin) vs. gentamicin plus clindamycin (gentamicin/clindamycin) in surgically treated patients with intraabdominal infections. Among 46 assessable patients in the sulbactam/ampicillin group, 40 were clinically cured or improved as compared with 36 of 37 patients in the gentamicin/clindamycin group. Among 40 microbiologically assessable patients in the sulbactam/ampicillin group, the pathogen was eradicated in 33 patients and partially eradicated in two, whereas eradication was recorded in 21 and partial eradication in 10 of the 32 patients in the gentamicin/clindamycin group. Among 150 aerobic isolates, 14 were resistant to sulbactam/ampicillin, 27 were resistant to gentamicin/clindamycin, and 85 were beta-lactamase producers. No resistance to sulbactam/ampicillin was found in 75 anaerobic isolates, whereas one anaerobic isolate was resistant to clindamycin. This preliminary report suggests that ampicillin/sulbactam is a useful nontoxic alterative to gentamicin/clindamycin in the treatment of intraabdominal infections.
Similar articles
-
A randomized, double-blind comparison of sulbactam/ampicillin and clindamycin for the treatment of aerobic and aerobic-anaerobic infections.Rev Infect Dis. 1986 Nov-Dec;8 Suppl 5:S569-75. doi: 10.1093/clinids/8.supplement_5.s569. Rev Infect Dis. 1986. PMID: 3026005 Clinical Trial.
-
Results of the North American trial of piperacillin/tazobactam compared with clindamycin and gentamicin in the treatment of severe intra-abdominal infections. Investigators of the Piperacillin/Tazobactam Intra-abdominal Infection Study Group.Eur J Surg Suppl. 1994;(573):61-6. Eur J Surg Suppl. 1994. PMID: 7524798 Clinical Trial.
-
Comparative clinical study of Sulbactam and ampicillin and clindamycin and tobramycin in infections of soft tissues.Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1986 Jun;162(6):575-8. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1986. PMID: 3012808 Clinical Trial.
-
Sulbactam/ampicillin in paediatric infections.Drugs. 1988;35 Suppl 7:35-8. doi: 10.2165/00003495-198800357-00009. Drugs. 1988. PMID: 3065053 Review.
-
Clinical pharmacology of antibiotics. Sulbactam/ampicillin.Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1988 Jul;9(7):323-7. doi: 10.1086/645863. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1988. PMID: 3042857 Review.
Cited by
-
Sulbactam/ampicillin. A review of its antibacterial activity, pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic use.Drugs. 1987 Jun;33(6):577-609. doi: 10.2165/00003495-198733060-00003. Drugs. 1987. PMID: 3038500 Review.
-
Current antimicrobial therapy of anaerobic infections.Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1992 Nov;11(11):999-1011. doi: 10.1007/BF01967790. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1992. PMID: 1295770 Review.
-
Canadian practice guidelines for surgical intra-abdominal infections.Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol. 2010 Spring;21(1):11-37. doi: 10.1155/2010/580340. Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol. 2010. PMID: 21358883 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Antibiotic regimens for secondary peritonitis of gastrointestinal origin in adults.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Apr 18;2005(2):CD004539. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004539.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005. PMID: 15846719 Free PMC article.
-
Penicillins. A current review of their clinical pharmacology and therapeutic use.Drugs. 1993 Jun;45(6):866-894. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199345060-00002. Drugs. 1993. PMID: 7691496 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Medical