Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Aug 9;7(1):7685.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-07522-z.

The interplay of social group biases in social threat learning

Affiliations

The interplay of social group biases in social threat learning

Armita Golkar et al. Sci Rep. .

Erratum in

Abstract

Learning from other individuals (e.g. social learning) is subjected to biases affecting whom to learn from. Consistent with research in animals, showing similarity-based learning biases and a general tendency to display pro-social responses to in-group individuals, we recently demonstrated that social learning of both fear and safety was enhanced when information was transmitted between same-race individuals. Here, we addressed how two different social group categories jointly affect the transmission of fears by investigating the interplay between racial and supporter group membership. We demonstrate that supporter group membership differentially influenced learning from a racial in-group vs. racial out-group individual. Thus, conditioned skin conductance responses in the same-race condition were significantly higher when fear was transmitted by an in-group (same team) vs. an out-group (rival team) individual, and were related to supporter team identification. However, supporter group membership did not influence learning from a racial out-group demonstrator, suggesting that the presence of an alternative alliance does not necessary reduce the influence of racial biases on social fear learning.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Mean CR (CS+ > CS−) across the experiments displayed for the Racial In-group and Racial Out-group separately as a function of Supporter group membership. (A) During observational acquisition SCRs to the CS+ were overall higher than to the CS− in the absence of significant group differences. (B) During the early stage of the direct test, supporter group membership significantly modulated CRs but only when fear was transmitted from a racial in-group demonstrator (C). During the late stage of the direct test, there were no between group differences left. Errors bars denote standard error of the mean (SEM). *p < 0.05.

References

    1. Laland KN. Social learning strategies. Learning & Behavior. 2004;32:4–14. doi: 10.3758/BF03196002. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Olsson A, Phelps EA. Social learning of fear. Nature neuroscience. 2007;10:1095–1102. doi: 10.1038/nn1968. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Boyd, R. & Richerson, P. J. Culture and the evolutionary process. (University of Chicago Press, 1985).
    1. Galef BG, Jr., Whiskin EE. Learning socially to eat more of one food than of another. Journal of comparative psychology (Washington, D.C.: 1983) 1995;109:99–101. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.109.1.99. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jeon D, et al. Observational fear learning involves affective pain system and Ca(v)1.2 Ca2+ channels in ACC. Nature neuroscience. 2010;13:482–U105. doi: 10.1038/nn.2504. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources