Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 Jul 20:21:96-104.
doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2017.07.047. eCollection 2017 Sep.

Breast reconstruction with anatomical implants: A review of indications and techniques based on current literature

Affiliations
Review

Breast reconstruction with anatomical implants: A review of indications and techniques based on current literature

Marco Gardani et al. Ann Med Surg (Lond). .

Abstract

One important modality of breast cancer therapy is surgical treatment, which has become increasingly less mutilating over the last century. Breast reconstruction has become an integrated part of breast cancer treatment due to long-term psychosexual health factors and its importance for breast cancer survivors. Both autogenous tissue-based and implant-based reconstruction provides satisfactory reconstructive options due to better surgeon awareness of "the ideal breast size", although each has its own advantages and disadvantages. An overview of the current options in breast reconstruction is presented in this article.

Keywords: Autologous reconstruction; Breast cancer; Plastic surgery; Prosthetic implants.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Bilateral nipple-sparing mastectomy, preoperative design.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Periareolar skin incision.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
All breast tissue removed.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Textured implant.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Anatomical silicone implant.
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Left mastectomy before reconstruction.
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Left mastectomy post two stage reconstruction.

References

    1. Torre L.A., Bray F., Siegel R.L., Ferlay J., Lortet-Tieulent J., Jemal A. Global cancer statistics, 2012. Cancer J. Clin. 2015;65:87–108. - PubMed
    1. DellaCroce F.J., Wolfe E.T. Breast reconstruction. Surg. Clin. North Am. 2013;93:445–454. - PubMed
    1. Fisher B., Montague E., Redmond C. Findings from NSABP protocol no. B-04-comparison of radical mastectomy with alterative treatments for primary breast cancer. I. Radiation comoplicance and its relation to treatment outcome. Cancer. 1980;46:1–13. - PubMed
    1. Cano S.J., Klassen A., Pusic A.L. The science behind quality-of-life measurement: a primer for plastic surgeons. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2009;123:98e–106e. - PubMed
    1. Cano S.J., Klassen A.F., Scott A.M., Cordeiro P.G., Pusic A.L. The BREAST-Q: further validation in independent clinical samples. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2012;129:293–302. - PubMed