Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2017 Nov;28(11):3113-3121.
doi: 10.1007/s00198-017-4183-0. Epub 2017 Aug 9.

Risk of low-energy fracture in type 2 diabetes patients: a meta-analysis of observational studies

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Risk of low-energy fracture in type 2 diabetes patients: a meta-analysis of observational studies

P Jia et al. Osteoporos Int. 2017 Nov.

Abstract

In this meta-analysis, evidence of an association between type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and low-energy fractures has been evaluated including 12 observational studies. The results suggested that T2DM patients had an enhanced risk of low-energy fractures.

Introduction: Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) patients have been shown to be at enhanced risk of fracture injury, but less is known about low-energy fractures among patients with T2DM.

Methods: We performed a meta-analysis of 12 observational studies identified in Medline and EMBASE that included 938,742 participants, including 30,827 low-energy fracture cases. The incidence rate ratios (IRRs) of low-energy fractures were determined using a random-effects model.

Results: The IRRs of low-energy fracture for men and women were 1.37 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.94-2.00; p = 0.096) and 1.22 (95% CI, 1.09-1.35; p = 0.000), respectively, and the overall IRR was 1.23 (95% CI, 1.12-1.35; p = 0.000). The IRRs for hip and vertebral fractures were 1.08 (95% CI, 1.02-1.15; p = 0.007) and 1.21 (95% CI, 0.98-1.48; p = 0.073), respectively. The IRRs of low-energy fracture in case-control, prospective, retrospective, and cross-sectional studies were 1.18 (95% CI, 0.81-1.72; p = 0.380), 1.17 (95% CI, 1.05-1.32, p = 0.006), 1.15 (95% CI, 1.02-1.29; p = 0.020), and 1.60 (95% CI, 1.21-2.12; p = 0.001), respectively. The IRRs of low-energy fracture for less than 5 years, 5 to 10 years, and more than 10 years were 1.30 (95%, CI 1.13-1.50; p = 0.000), 1.05 (95% CI, 1.03-1.08; p = 0.000), and 1.19 (95% CI, 1.00-1.41; p = 0.049), respectively.

Conclusions: Patients with T2DM had a greater risk of low-energy fracture especially of the hip, compared with that in non-diabetic subjects. However, since according to our funnel plot a publication bias may be present and due to study heterogeneity as well as the limited number of publications, the finding needs to be interpreted with caution.

Keywords: Low-energy fracture; Meta-analysis; Type 2 diabetes.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2017 Apr;29(2):301-309 - PubMed
    1. J Bone Miner Res. 2014 Apr;29(4):787-95 - PubMed
    1. Diabetes Care. 2001 Jul;24(7):1192-7 - PubMed
    1. Osteoporos Int. 2012 Feb;23(2):635-41 - PubMed
    1. J Bone Miner Res. 2009 Apr;24(4):702-9 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources