Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 Apr;11(2):193-206.
doi: 10.1007/s40271-017-0270-8.

Evaluation of Patient and Family Engagement Strategies to Improve Medication Safety

Affiliations
Review

Evaluation of Patient and Family Engagement Strategies to Improve Medication Safety

Julia M Kim et al. Patient. 2018 Apr.

Abstract

Background: Patient and family engagement (PFE) is critical for patient safety. We systematically reviewed types of PFE strategies implemented and their impact on medication safety.

Methods: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, reference lists and websites to August 2016. Two investigators independently reviewed all abstracts and articles, and articles were additionally reviewed by two senior investigators for selection. One investigator abstracted data and two investigators reviewed the data for accuracy. Study quality was determined by consensus. Investigators developed a framework for defining the level of patient engagement: informing patients about medications (Level 1), informing about engagement with health care providers (Level 2), empowering patients with communication tools and skills (Level 3), partnering with patients in their care (Level 4), and integrating patients as full care team members (Level 5).

Results: We included 19 studies that mostly targeted older adults taking multiple medications. The median level of engagement was 2, ranging from 2-4. We identified no level 5 studies. Key themes for patient engagement strategies impacting medication safety were patient education and medication reconciliation, with a subtheme of patient portals. Most studies (84%) reported implementation outcomes. The most commonly reported medication safety outcomes were medication errors, including near misses and discrepancies (47%), and medication safety knowledge (37%). Most studies (63%) were of medium to low quality, and risk of bias was generally moderate. Among the 11 studies with control groups, 55% (n = 6) reported statistically significant improvement on at least one medication safety outcome. Further synthesis of medication safety measures was limited due to intervention and outcome heterogeneity.

Conclusions: Key strategies for engaging patients in medication safety are education and medication reconciliation. Patient engagement levels were generally low, as defined by a novel framework for determining levels of patient engagement. As more patient engagement studies are conducted, this framework should be evaluated for associations with patient outcomes.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2009 May;35(5):264-70 - PubMed
    1. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014 Feb;21(e1):e157-62 - PubMed
    1. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2016 Jan;23 (1):159-65 - PubMed
    1. J Eval Clin Pract. 2013 Apr;19(2):285-91 - PubMed
    1. Health Expect. 2016 Jun;19(3):516-26 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources