Growth of the hard palate in infants with Down syndrome compared with healthy infants-A retrospective case control study
- PMID: 28796822
- PMCID: PMC5552113
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182728
Growth of the hard palate in infants with Down syndrome compared with healthy infants-A retrospective case control study
Erratum in
-
Correction: Growth of the hard palate in infants with Down syndrome compared with healthy infants-A retrospective case control study.PLoS One. 2018 Sep 7;13(9):e0203899. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0203899. eCollection 2018. PLoS One. 2018. PMID: 30192886 Free PMC article.
Abstract
Objective: To investigate morphological differences of the hard palate in infants with Down syndrome (DS) compared with a volumetric-matched control group (CG).
Methods: Trial design: retrospective case control study. Based on inclusion and exclusion criteria, plaster casts of edentulous maxillae of 40 DS infants (20 females and 20 males, aged 221.3 ± 132.4 days) and 40 CG infants (20 females and 20 males, aged 53.9 ± 87.2 days) were digitized and converted into 3-dimensional stereolithography data. An automated landmark- and investigator-independent method for assessing two-dimensional measurements such as width, depth, and length of palate, as well as palatal index and the 3-dimensional volume, were used.
Results: Matching DS and healthy CG infants by age, we found reduced sizes in all linear and volumetric measurements in the DS group. Matching both groups by palatal volume, we found no differences between the groups according to palatal width (p = .93), palatal depth (p = .32), and palatal index (p = .31). Control infants with the same palatal volume compared with the DS infants were about 151 days younger, 95%-CI = [102, 200] (Hodges-Lehmann estimator). Except for palatal length and palatal volume, the growth pattern of DS palates decreased irregularly at age 6 to 9 months.
Conclusions: The palate of DS infants in the first 6 to 9 month of life is of normal shape but considerably smaller compared with healthy normals. From 6 to 9 months onward, the growth pattern of the hard palate in DS infants decreases irregularly. High-arch-constricted palates could, therefore, be interpreted as secondarily acquired in later life. We therefore speculate that it could be advantageous to begin oral muscular stimulating therapy between 6 and 9 months of age which may prevent palatal shape alterations and enhance oral function which also contributes to maxillary development.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures



Similar articles
-
Three-dimensional hard tissue palatal size and shape in Down syndrome subjects.Eur J Orthod. 2007 Aug;29(4):417-22. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjm026. Eur J Orthod. 2007. PMID: 17702802
-
Palatal and dental arch morphology in Down syndrome.Coll Antropol. 2004 Dec;28(2):841-7. Coll Antropol. 2004. PMID: 15666619
-
Morphometry of the hard palate in Down's syndrome through CBCT-image analysis.Orthod Craniofac Res. 2015 Nov;18(4):212-20. doi: 10.1111/ocr.12097. Epub 2015 May 27. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2015. PMID: 26012631
-
Palatal development of preterm and low birthweight infants compared to term infants - What do we know? Part 2: The palate of the preterm/low birthweight infant.Head Face Med. 2005 Oct 28;1:9. doi: 10.1186/1746-160X-1-9. Head Face Med. 2005. PMID: 16270909 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Palatal development of preterm and low birthweight infants compared to term infants - What do we know? Part 1: The palate of the term newborn.Head Face Med. 2005 Oct 28;1:8. doi: 10.1186/1746-160X-1-8. Head Face Med. 2005. PMID: 16270908 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Correction: Growth of the hard palate in infants with Down syndrome compared with healthy infants-A retrospective case control study.PLoS One. 2018 Sep 7;13(9):e0203899. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0203899. eCollection 2018. PLoS One. 2018. PMID: 30192886 Free PMC article.
-
Conformity between Pacifier Design and Palate Shape in Preterm and Term Infants Considering Age-Specific Palate Size, Facial Profile and Lip Thickness.Children (Basel). 2022 May 25;9(6):773. doi: 10.3390/children9060773. Children (Basel). 2022. PMID: 35740710 Free PMC article.
-
The heritability of vocal tract structures estimated from structural MRI in a large cohort of Dutch twins.Hum Genet. 2022 Dec;141(12):1905-1923. doi: 10.1007/s00439-022-02469-2. Epub 2022 Jul 13. Hum Genet. 2022. PMID: 35831475 Free PMC article.
-
Vowel Production in Children and Adults With Down Syndrome: Fundamental and Formant Frequencies of the Corner Vowels.J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2023 Apr 12;66(4):1208-1239. doi: 10.1044/2022_JSLHR-22-00510. Epub 2023 Apr 4. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2023. PMID: 37015000 Free PMC article.
-
Orofacial findings and orthodontic treatment conditions in patients with down syndrome - a retrospective investigation.Head Face Med. 2023 May 6;19(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s13005-023-00362-5. Head Face Med. 2023. PMID: 37149612 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Cicero S, Curcio P, Rembouskos G, Sonek J, Nicolaides KH. Maxillary length at 11–14 weeks of gestation in fetuses with trisomy 21. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2004;24: 19–22. doi: 10.1002/uog.1077 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Lauridsen H, Hansen BF, Reintoft I, Keeling JW, Skovgaard LT, Kjr I. Short hard palate in prenatal trisomy 21. Orthod Craniofacial Res. 2005;8: 91–95. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-6343.2005.00318.x - DOI - PubMed
-
- Allanson JE, O’Hara P, Farkas LG, Nair RC. Anthropometric craniofacial pattern profiles in Down syndrome. Am J Med Genet. 1993;47: 748–752. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.1320470530 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Skrinjarić T, Glavina D, Jukić J. Palatal and dental arch morphology in Down syndrome. Coll Antropol. 2004;28: 841–847. - PubMed
-
- Bauer D, Evans CA, Begole EA, Salzmann L. Severity of occlusal disharmonies in Down syndrome. Int J Dent. 2012;2012: 0–5. doi: 10.1155/2012/872367 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical