MRI Fusion-Targeted Transrectal Prostate Biopsy and the Role of Prostate-Specific Antigen Density and Prostate Health Index for the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Southeast Asian Men
- PMID: 28797178
- DOI: 10.1089/end.2017.0485
MRI Fusion-Targeted Transrectal Prostate Biopsy and the Role of Prostate-Specific Antigen Density and Prostate Health Index for the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Southeast Asian Men
Abstract
Objective: To test the hypothesis that targeted biopsy has a higher detection rate for clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) than systematic biopsy. We defined csPCa as any Gleason sum ≥7 cancer. In patients with Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) 3 lesions, to determine if factors, such as prostate-specific antigen density (PSAD) and prostate health index (PHI), can predict csPCa and help select patients for biopsy.
Materials and methods: We report the first series of targeted biopsies in Southeast Asian men, with comparison against systematic biopsy. Consecutive patients were registered into a prospective institutional review board-approved database in our institution. We reviewed patients who underwent biopsy from May 2016 to June 2017. Inclusion criteria for our study were patients with at least one PI-RADS ≥3, and who underwent both targeted and systematic biopsies in the same sitting.
Results: There were 115 patients in the study, of whom 74 (64.3%) had a previous negative systematic biopsy. Targeted biopsies detected significantly less Gleason 6 cancers than systematic biopsies (p < 0.01), and demonstrated significantly higher sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value (NPV) for the detection of csPCa. For patients with PI-RADS 3 lesions, PHI and PSAD were found to be the best predictors for csPCa. PSAD <0.10 ng/mL/mL had an NPV of 93% and sensitivity of 92%, while allowing 20% of patients to avoid biopsy. PHI cutoff of <27 would allow 34% of patients to avoid biopsy, with both sensitivity and NPV of 100%.
Conclusions: Targeted prostate biopsies were found to be significantly superior to systematic biopsies for the detection of csPCa, while detecting less Gleason 6 cancer. Usage of PSAD and PHI cutoff levels in patients with PI-RADS 3 lesions may enable a number of patients to avoid unnecessary biopsy.
Keywords: MRI fusion; PHI; PI-RADS; PSAD; prostate cancer; targeted biopsy.
Similar articles
-
Added Value of Prostate-specific Antigen Density in Selecting Prostate Biopsy Candidates Among Men with Elevated Prostate-specific Antigen and PI-RADS ≥3 Lesions on Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Prostate: A Systematic Assessment by PI-RADS Score.Eur Urol Focus. 2024 Jul;10(4):634-640. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2023.10.006. Epub 2023 Oct 19. Eur Urol Focus. 2024. PMID: 37865591
-
How to make clinical decisions to avoid unnecessary prostate screening in biopsy-naïve men with PI-RADs v2 score ≤ 3?Int J Clin Oncol. 2020 Jan;25(1):175-186. doi: 10.1007/s10147-019-01524-9. Epub 2019 Aug 31. Int J Clin Oncol. 2020. PMID: 31473884
-
Predictors of prostate cancer detection in MRI PI-RADS 3 lesions - Reality of a tertiary center.Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2023 Dec 20;95(4):11830. doi: 10.4081/aiua.2023.11830. Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2023. PMID: 38117217
-
Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Clinical, and Biopsy Findings in Suspected Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Mar 4;7(3):e244258. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.4258. JAMA Netw Open. 2024. PMID: 38551559 Free PMC article.
-
Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Prostate Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.JAMA Oncol. 2024 Jun 1;10(6):745-754. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2024.0734. JAMA Oncol. 2024. PMID: 38576242 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
TREXIT: initial experience with transperineal prostate biopsy under local anesthesia in an outpatient setting in South East Asia.Asian J Androl. 2021 Sep-Oct;23(5):543-544. doi: 10.4103/aja.aja_24_21. Asian J Androl. 2021. PMID: 33818524 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Comparison of prostate cancer detection rates between magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsy and transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy according to Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System in patients with PSA ≥4 ng/mL: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Transl Androl Urol. 2019 Dec;8(6):741-753. doi: 10.21037/tau.2019.12.03. Transl Androl Urol. 2019. PMID: 32038971 Free PMC article.
-
Correlation between Gleason score distribution and Prostate Health Index in patients with prostate-specific antigen values of 2.5-10 ng/mL.Investig Clin Urol. 2020 Nov;61(6):582-587. doi: 10.4111/icu.20200084. Investig Clin Urol. 2020. PMID: 33135403 Free PMC article.
-
The role of MRI/TRUS fusion biopsy in the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer.Ther Adv Urol. 2020 May 18;12:1756287220916613. doi: 10.1177/1756287220916613. eCollection 2020 Jan-Dec. Ther Adv Urol. 2020. PMID: 32489424 Free PMC article.
-
The Utility of Prostate Specific Antigen Density, Prostate Health Index, and Prostate Health Index Density in Predicting Positive Prostate Biopsy Outcome is Dependent on the Prostate Biopsy Methods.Urology. 2019 Jul;129:153-159. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2019.03.018. Epub 2019 Mar 27. Urology. 2019. PMID: 30926382 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous