Comparison of the Efficacy of Tenofovir Versus Tenofovir plus Entecavir in the Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis B in Patients With Poor Efficacy of Entecavir: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
- PMID: 28797777
- DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2017.07.015
Comparison of the Efficacy of Tenofovir Versus Tenofovir plus Entecavir in the Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis B in Patients With Poor Efficacy of Entecavir: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Abstract
Purpose: This study aimed to compare the efficacy between tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) and TDF plus entecavir (ETV) combination therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) with a poor response to ETV.
Methods: We searched the China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), PubMed, EMBASE, and SCOPE libraries for articles using the keywords chronic hepatitis B virus or CHB or HBV, entecavir or ETV, and tenofovir or TDF.
Findings: Five studies (from CNKI and PubMed) with a total of 408 patients met the inclusion criteria: 212 patients in the TDF group and 196 patients in the TDF plus ETV group. The rates of viral suppression between the 2 groups were comparable at weeks 24 and 48 of treatment (P = 0.546 vs P = 0.818). In addition, the subanalysis revealed that no significant differences were observed in the rates of viral suppression between the 2 groups at week 24 (subgroup 1 [partial response to ETV]: P = 0.822; subgroup 2 [resistance to ETV]: P = 0.294) and week 48 (subgroup 1: P = 0.797; subgroup 2: P = 0.545). No significant differences were found in alanine aminotransferase normalization, hepatitis B e antigen loss, hepatitis B e antigen seroconversion, virologic breakthrough, and tolerability between the 2 groups at weeks 24 and 48. Therefore, the results suggest that TDF monotherapy should be chosen for patients with CHB with a poor response to ETV for reasons of economy and convenience.
Implications: We conclude that TDF monotherapy is comparable to TDF-ETV combination therapy for patients with a poor response to ETV; thus, TDF monotherapy may be a better choice for these patients. However, because of the limited citations in this meta-analysis, complete and systematic evidence is needed to evaluate the differences in efficacy and tolerability between TDF and TDF-ETV. Larger and longer randomized clinical trials and further studies should be conducted to verify the results.
Keywords: chronic hepatitis B; entecavir; entecavir resistance; partial response; tenofovir; tenofovir plus entecavir.
Copyright © 2017. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Similar articles
-
Risk of hepatocellular carcinoma in antiviral treatment-naïve chronic hepatitis B patients treated with entecavir or tenofovir disoproxil fumarate: a network meta-analysis.BMC Cancer. 2022 Mar 17;22(1):287. doi: 10.1186/s12885-022-09413-7. BMC Cancer. 2022. PMID: 35300634 Free PMC article.
-
Efficacy and Safety of Tenofovir Plus Entecavir Combination Therapy Versus Tenofovir Monotherapy in Chronic Hepatitis B Virus Patients With Resistance or Partial Response to Entecavir: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.J Clin Exp Hepatol. 2025 Jul-Aug;15(4):102541. doi: 10.1016/j.jceh.2025.102541. Epub 2025 Mar 19. J Clin Exp Hepatol. 2025. PMID: 40248347 Review.
-
Efficacy and cost-effectiveness of antiviral regimens for entecavir-resistant hepatitis B: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2020 Dec;19(6):507-514. doi: 10.1016/j.hbpd.2020.09.007. Epub 2020 Sep 29. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2020. PMID: 33051132
-
Lamivudine plus adefovir combination therapy versus entecavir monotherapy for lamivudine-resistant chronic hepatitis B: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Virol J. 2011 Aug 8;8:393. doi: 10.1186/1743-422X-8-393. Virol J. 2011. PMID: 21824397 Free PMC article.
-
The efficacy and safety comparison between tenofovir and entecavir in treatment of chronic hepatitis B and HBV related cirrhosis: A systematic review and Meta-analysis.Int Immunopharmacol. 2017 Jan;42:168-175. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2016.11.022. Epub 2016 Dec 1. Int Immunopharmacol. 2017. PMID: 27915131
Cited by
-
The scientific basis of combination therapy for chronic hepatitis B functional cure.Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023 Apr;20(4):238-253. doi: 10.1038/s41575-022-00724-5. Epub 2023 Jan 11. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023. PMID: 36631717 Review.
-
Guidelines for Prevention and Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis B.J Clin Transl Hepatol. 2021 Oct 28;9(5):769-791. doi: 10.14218/JCTH.2021.00209. Epub 2021 Sep 28. J Clin Transl Hepatol. 2021. PMID: 34722192 Free PMC article.
-
KASL clinical practice guidelines for management of chronic hepatitis B.Clin Mol Hepatol. 2019 Jun;25(2):93-159. doi: 10.3350/cmh.2019.1002. Epub 2019 Jun 12. Clin Mol Hepatol. 2019. PMID: 31185710 Free PMC article. Review. No abstract available.
-
Entecavir versus Tenofovir for the Prevention of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Treatment-naïve Chronic Hepatitis B Patients in Korea.J Korean Med Sci. 2021 Apr 12;36(14):e89. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2021.36.e89. J Korean Med Sci. 2021. PMID: 33847080 Free PMC article.
-
Entecavir-based combination therapies for chronic hepatitis B: A meta-analysis.Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Dec;97(51):e13596. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000013596. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018. PMID: 30572464 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous