Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jul 26:8:1215.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01215. eCollection 2017.

A Qualitative Investigation on Patient Empowerment in Prostate Cancer

Affiliations

A Qualitative Investigation on Patient Empowerment in Prostate Cancer

Chiara Renzi et al. Front Psychol. .

Abstract

Purpose: Men with prostate cancer often describe low levels of empowerment. eHealth interventions may represent useful tools to deliver care and education and to meet patients' needs within an empowerment framework. In order to design a platform for cancer patients' empowerment within the H2020 iManageCancer project, the perspective of the target population for the platform was assessed. The present study aims to assess the qualitative experience of prostate cancer patients during treatment in order to provide insights for clinical practice with a particular focus on the design of a web platform to promote cancer patients' empowerment. Methods: Ten patients undergoing radiation therapy treatment took part in a semi-structured interview to explore different aspects of patient empowerment. Four main thematic areas were addressed: patient-healthcare providers' communication, decision-making, needs, and resources. A qualitative approach using thematic analysis was followed. Results: Half of the patients reported little to no possibility to share information and questions with healthcare providers. With regards to decision-making, the role of healthcare providers was perceived as directive/informative, but half of the patients perceived to assume an active role in at least one interaction. Difficulties and needs included the choice of the specialist or of the structure after diagnosis, clinicians' support in self-management, surgical consequences, and side effects, preparation for radiation therapy. Resources included family and social support both from a practical and from an emotional perspective, coping style, and work schedule management. Conclusions: These results suggest that relations with healthcare providers should be supported, especially immediately after diagnosis and after surgery. Support to self-management after surgery and at the beginning of radiation therapy treatment also constitutes a priority. The adoption of a personalized approach from the beginning of prostate cancer care flow may promote patient empowerment, overcoming the aforementioned needs and mobilizing resources. The social network represents an important resource that could be integrated in interventions. These considerations will be taken into account in the design of a cancer self-management platform aiming to increase patients' empowerment.

Keywords: decision-making; eHealth; patient empowerment; personalized medicine; prostate cancer; radiation therapy; unmet needs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Graphic representation of reported difficulties by temporal dimensions (diagnosis, surgery, radiation therapy) and type (Emotional/relational, Practical/organizational).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Graphic representation of reported resources by temporal dimensions (diagnosis, surgery, radiation therapy) and type (Emotional/relational, Practical/organizational).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ambrosio L., Senosiain García J. M., Riverol Fernández M., Anaut Bravo S., Díaz De Cerio Ayesa S., Ursúa Sesma M. E., et al. . (2015). Living with chronic illness in adults: a concept analysis. J. Clin. Nurs. 24, 2357–2367. 10.1111/jocn.12827 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Berry D. L., Blumenstein B. A., Halpenny B., Wolpin S., Fann J. R., Austin-Seymour M., et al. . (2011). Enhancing patient-provider communication with the electronic self-report assessment for cancer: a randomized trial. J. Clin. Oncol. 29, 1029–1035. 10.1200/JCO.2010.30.3909 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bourke L., Boorjian S. A., Briganti A., Klotz L., Mucci L., Resnick M. J., et al. . (2015). Survivorship and improving quality of life in men with prostate cancer. Eur. Urol. 68, 374–383. 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.04.023 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Boyatzis R. E. (1998). Transforming Qualitative Information: Thematic Analysis and Code Development. London: Sage Publications.
    1. Cegala D. J., Bahnson R. R., Clinton S. K., David P., Gong M. C., Monk J. P., III, et al. . (2008). Information seeking and satisfaction with physician-patient communication among prostate cancer survivors. Health Commun. 23, 62–69. 10.1080/10410230701806982 - DOI - PubMed