Robotic-assisted gait training combined with transcranial direct current stimulation in chronic stroke patients: A pilot double-blind, randomized controlled trial
- PMID: 28800341
- DOI: 10.3233/RNN-170745
Robotic-assisted gait training combined with transcranial direct current stimulation in chronic stroke patients: A pilot double-blind, randomized controlled trial
Abstract
Background: Although robotic-assisted gait training (RAGT) is becoming a standard method in stroke rehabilitation, its effect on chronic stroke patients is uncertain.
Objective: This study aimed to investigate whether anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) enhances the effect of RAGT on functional ambulation in chronic stroke patients.
Methods: Chronic hemiplegic stroke patients with a Functional Ambulatory Category (FAC) score≤4 were randomly assigned to either the RAGT with anodal tDCS (Anodal) group the sham tDCS (Sham) group. The patients were provided with RAGT for 45 min after allocated tDCS on the leg motor cortex in the impaired hemisphere for 20 min every weekday for 2 weeks. The primary outcome measure was the FAC, and the secondary outcome measures included 10-m walking test, 6-min walking test, Berg Balance Scale, Fugl-Meyer assessment of the lower extremity, Medical Research Council Scale, and motor-evoked potential (MEP) parameters. They were evaluated before treatment (T0), immediately after treatment (T1), and 4 weeks after the end of treatment (T2).
Results: Twenty-one patients were finally included. The percentage of participants who achieved improvement in the FAC score was greater in the Anodal group than in the Sham group, and the difference was significant at T2 (66.7% vs. 12.5%, p = 0.024). In secondary outcome measures, the Anodal group showed greater improvement in the 6-min walking test than the Sham group at T2 (56.49±38.87 vs. 23.59±17.00, p = 0.038). The changes in the MEP parameters were not significantly different between the two groups.
Conclusion: This pilot study suggested that anodal tDCS on the leg motor cortex in the impaired hemisphere may facilitate the effect of RAGT on functional ambulation in chronic stroke patients. Larger clinical trials will be needed to confirm the effect of RAGT combined with tDCS in chronic stroke patients based on the present study.
Keywords: Stroke; gait; robotics; stroke rehabilitation; transcranial direct current stimulation.
Similar articles
-
tDCS does not enhance the effects of robot-assisted gait training in patients with subacute stroke.Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2017;35(4):377-384. doi: 10.3233/RNN-170734. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2017. PMID: 28697574
-
Offline effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on reaction times of lower extremity movements in people after stroke: a pilot cross-over study.J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2019 Nov 7;16(1):136. doi: 10.1186/s12984-019-0604-y. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2019. PMID: 31699109 Free PMC article.
-
The impact of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) combined with modified constraint-induced movement therapy (mCIMT) on upper limb function in chronic stroke: a double-blind randomized controlled trial.Disabil Rehabil. 2016;38(7):653-60. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2015.1055382. Epub 2015 Jun 10. Disabil Rehabil. 2016. PMID: 26061222 Clinical Trial.
-
Effect and optimal exercise prescription of robot-assisted gait training on lower extremity motor function in stroke patients: a network meta-analysis.Neurol Sci. 2025 Mar;46(3):1151-1167. doi: 10.1007/s10072-024-07780-6. Epub 2024 Sep 23. Neurol Sci. 2025. PMID: 39312061 Review.
-
Efficacy of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation for upper extremity function after ischemic stroke: A systematic review of parallel randomized clinical trials.J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2025 Jan;34(1):108112. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2024.108112. Epub 2024 Nov 4. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2025. PMID: 39505058
Cited by
-
Combining transcranial direct-current stimulation with gait training in patients with neurological disorders: a systematic review.J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2019 Sep 14;16(1):114. doi: 10.1186/s12984-019-0591-z. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2019. PMID: 31521179 Free PMC article.
-
Review of tDCS Configurations for Stimulation of the Lower-Limb Area of Motor Cortex and Cerebellum.Brain Sci. 2022 Feb 11;12(2):248. doi: 10.3390/brainsci12020248. Brain Sci. 2022. PMID: 35204011 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) for improving activities of daily living, and physical and cognitive functioning, in people after stroke.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Nov 11;11(11):CD009645. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009645.pub4. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020. PMID: 33175411 Free PMC article.
-
Breaking the ice to improve motor outcomes in patients with chronic stroke: a retrospective clinical study on neuromodulation plus robotics.Neurol Sci. 2021 Jul;42(7):2785-2793. doi: 10.1007/s10072-020-04875-8. Epub 2020 Nov 6. Neurol Sci. 2021. PMID: 33159273 Clinical Trial.
-
Short term effects of anodal cerebellar vs. anodal cerebral transcranial direct current stimulation in stroke patients, a randomized control trial.Front Neurosci. 2022 Nov 24;16:1035558. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2022.1035558. eCollection 2022. Front Neurosci. 2022. PMID: 36507323 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical