Improved usability of a multi-infusion setup using a centralized control interface: A task-based usability test
- PMID: 28800617
- PMCID: PMC5553772
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183104
Improved usability of a multi-infusion setup using a centralized control interface: A task-based usability test
Abstract
The objective of this study was to assess the usability benefits of adding a bedside central control interface that controls all intravenous (IV) infusion pumps compared to the conventional individual control of multiple infusion pumps. Eighteen dedicated ICU nurses volunteered in a between-subjects task-based usability test. A newly developed central control interface was compared to conventional control of multiple infusion pumps in a simulated ICU setting. Task execution time, clicks, errors and questionnaire responses were evaluated. Overall the central control interface outperformed the conventional control in terms of fewer user actions (40±3 vs. 73±20 clicks, p<0.001) and fewer user errors (1±1 vs. 3±2 errors, p<0.05), with no difference in task execution times (421±108 vs. 406±119 seconds, not significant). Questionnaires indicated a significant preference for the central control interface. Despite being novice users of the central control interface, ICU nurses displayed improved performance with the central control interface compared to the conventional interface they were familiar with. We conclude that the new user interface has an overall better usability than the conventional interface.
Conflict of interest statement
References
-
- Garmer K, Liljegren E, Osvalder A-L, Dahlman S. Application of usability testing to the development of medical equipment. Usability testing of a frequently used infusion pump and a new user interface for an infusion pump developed with a Human Factors approach. Int J Ind Ergon [Internet]. 2002. March;29(3):145–59. Available from: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0169814101000609
-
- Gosbee JW. Conclusion: You need human factors engineering expertise to see design hazards that are hiding in “plain sight!”. Respir Care [Internet]. 2004. December;30(12):696–700. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15646103 - PubMed
-
- Ward JR, Clarkson PJ. An analysis of medical device-related errors: prevalence and possible solutions. J Med Eng Technol [Internet]. 2004. [cited 2013 Jul 24];28(1):2–21. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14660181 doi: 10.1080/0309190031000123747 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Liljegren E, Osvalder a.-L, Dahlman S. Setting the Requirements for a User-Friendly Infusion Pump. Proc Hum Factors Ergon Soc Annu Meet [Internet]. 2000. July 1 [cited 2012 Jun 18];44(1):132–5. Available from: http://pro.sagepub.com/lookup/doi/10.1177/154193120004400135 - DOI
-
- Husch M, Sullivan C, Rooney D, Barnard C, Fotis M, Clarke J, et al. Insights from the sharp end of intravenous medication errors: implications for infusion pump technology. Qual Saf Health Care [Internet]. 2005. April [cited 2013 Aug 27];14(2):80–6. Available from: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=1743987&tool=p... doi: 10.1136/qshc.2004.011957 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
