Pain Measurement in Mechanically Ventilated Patients After Cardiac Surgery: Comparison of the Behavioral Pain Scale (BPS) and the Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool (CPOT)
- PMID: 28800982
- DOI: 10.1053/j.jvca.2017.03.013
Pain Measurement in Mechanically Ventilated Patients After Cardiac Surgery: Comparison of the Behavioral Pain Scale (BPS) and the Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool (CPOT)
Abstract
Objectives: The Behavioral Pain Scale (BPS) and Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool (CPOT) are behavioral pain assessment tools for sedated and unconscious critically ill patients. The aim of this study was to compare the reliability, internal consistency, and discriminant validation of the BPS and the CPOT simultaneously in mechanically ventilated patients after cardiac surgery.
Design: A prospective, observational cohort study.
Setting: A 20-bed closed-format intensive care unit with mixed medical, surgical, and cardiac surgery patients in a teaching hospital in Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Participants: The study comprised 72 consecutive intubated and mechanically ventilated patients after cardiac surgery who were not able to self-report pain.
Measurements and main results: Two nurses assessed the BPS and CPOT simultaneously and independently at the following 4 moments: rest, a nonpainful procedure (oral care), rest, and a painful procedure (turning). Both scores showed a significant increase of 2 points between rest and turning. The median BPS score of nurse 1 showed a significant increase of 1 point between rest and the nonpainful procedure (oral care), whereas both median CPOT scores did not change. The interrater reliability of the BPS and CPOT showed fair-to-good agreement of 0.74 overall. During the periods of rest 1 and rest 2, values ranged from 0.24 to 0.46. Cronbach's alpha values for the BPS were 0.62 (nurse 1) and 0.59 (nurse 2) compared with 0.65 and 0.58, respectively, for the CPOT.
Conclusions: The BPS and CPOT are reliable and valid pain assessment tools in a daily clinical setting. However, the discriminant validation of both scores seems less satisfactory in sedated or agitated patients and this topic requires further investigation.
Keywords: Behavioral Pain Scale; Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool; cardiac surgery; cardiothoracic surgery; intensive care; mechanical ventilation; pain assessment.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Pain in the ICU; Can We Adequately Treat What We Can't Hear?J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2017 Aug;31(4):1153-1154. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2017.04.037. Epub 2017 Apr 20. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2017. PMID: 28800980 No abstract available.
-
Postoperative Pain After Cardiac Surgery: An Open Issue.J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2018 Feb;32(1):e24-e25. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2017.09.022. Epub 2017 Sep 20. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2018. PMID: 29217242 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Pain measurement in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients: Behavioral Pain Scale versus Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool.J Crit Care. 2015 Feb;30(1):167-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2014.09.007. Epub 2014 Sep 22. J Crit Care. 2015. PMID: 25446372
-
Evaluation of Two Observational Pain Assessment Tools in Chinese Critically Ill Patients.Pain Med. 2015 Aug;16(8):1622-8. doi: 10.1111/pme.12742. Epub 2015 Mar 20. Pain Med. 2015. PMID: 25800546
-
Reliability of three linguistically and culturally validated pain assessment tools for sedated ICU patients by ICU nurses in Finland.Scand J Pain. 2018 Apr 25;18(2):165-173. doi: 10.1515/sjpain-2017-0139. Scand J Pain. 2018. PMID: 29794299
-
Methods of pain assessment in adult intensive care unit patients - Polish version of the CPOT (Critical Care Pain Observation Tool) and BPS (Behavioral Pain Scale).Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2017;49(1):66-72. doi: 10.5603/AIT.2017.0010. Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2017. PMID: 28362033 Review.
-
Development of a pain management algorithm for intensive care units.Heart Lung. 2015 Nov-Dec;44(6):521-7. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2015.09.001. Heart Lung. 2015. PMID: 26572773 Review.
Cited by
-
Surgery patients' perspectives of their role in postoperative pain: A scoping review.Int J Nurs Stud Adv. 2023 Mar 30;5:100124. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2023.100124. eCollection 2023 Dec. Int J Nurs Stud Adv. 2023. PMID: 38746556 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison between Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool and physiologic indicators for pain assessment in the critically ill, mechanically ventilated adult patients.Saudi J Anaesth. 2018 Jul-Sep;12(3):384-388. doi: 10.4103/sja.SJA_642_17. Saudi J Anaesth. 2018. PMID: 30100835 Free PMC article.
-
The German version of the Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool for critically ill adults : A prospective validation study.Anaesthesist. 2019 Dec;68(12):836-842. doi: 10.1007/s00101-019-00694-5. Epub 2019 Nov 20. Anaesthesist. 2019. PMID: 31748831 English.
-
Comparison of two behavioural pain scales for the assessment of procedural pain: A systematic review.Nurs Open. 2021 Sep;8(5):2050-2060. doi: 10.1002/nop2.714. Epub 2020 Nov 28. Nurs Open. 2021. PMID: 34388865 Free PMC article.
-
Chronic Pain Treatment and Digital Health Era-An Opinion.Front Public Health. 2021 Dec 10;9:779328. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.779328. eCollection 2021. Front Public Health. 2021. PMID: 34957031 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical