Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Aug 11;7(8):e014560.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014560.

The benefits of hardware removal in patients with pain or discomfort after fracture healing of the ankle: a systematic review protocol

Alexandra Thune  1 , Mårten Hagelberg  1 , Hans Nåsell  1 , Olof Sköldenberg  1
Affiliations

The benefits of hardware removal in patients with pain or discomfort after fracture healing of the ankle: a systematic review protocol

Alexandra Thune et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Introduction: For any orthopaedic surgeon working with trauma; ankle fractures are one of the most common injuries treated. The treatment of ankle fractures can be conservative, using external fixation, but more commonly the fractures are treated with open reduction and internal fixation. Residual pain and discomfort are common in patients after surgical treatment of fractures of the ankle. Sometimes it is difficult to determine whether the pain or discomfort is due to the implants left in situ or the primary injury itself. In many cases, the decision is made to remove the implants. Extraction of internal fixation material from the ankle is a common procedure in many orthopaedic clinics. There are no evidence-based guidelines or consensus regarding the effect of hardware removal from the ankle. The aim of this protocol is to describe the method that will be used to collect, describe and analyse the current evidence regarding hardware removal after fracture healing of the ankle.

Methods and analysis: We will conduct a systematic review of studies that were published after 1967 regarding the benefits of hardware removal in patients with pain or discomfort after fracture healing of the ankle. Study selection will follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. We will make a predefined search strategy and use it in several databases. We will include both randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and non-RCT studies. We will use descriptive statistics to summarise the studies collected. If more than one RCT is collected then a meta-analysis will be conducted. The quality of evidence will be assessed using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation guidelines.

Ethics and dissemination: No ethics approval is required as no primary data will be collected. Once complete, the results will be made available by peer-reviewed publication.

Trial registration number: PROSPERO registration number CRD42016039186.

Keywords: ankle fracture; hardware removal; pain.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

References

    1. Thur CK, Edgren G, Jansson KÅ, et al. . Epidemiology of adult ankle fractures in Sweden between 1987 and 2004: a population-based study of 91,410 swedish inpatients. Acta Orthop 2012;83:276–81. 10.3109/17453674.2012.672091 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Court-Brown CM, McBirnie J, Wilson G, et al. . Adult ankle fractures--an increasing problem? Acta Orthop Scand 1998;69:43–7. 10.3109/17453679809002355 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Court-Brown CM, Caesar B. Epidemiology of adult fractures: a review. Injury 2006;37:691–7. 10.1016/j.injury.2006.04.130 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Shah NH, Sundaram RO, Velusamy A, et al. . Five-year functional outcome analysis of ankle fracture fixation. Injury 2007;38:1308–12. 10.1016/j.injury.2007.06.002 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lindsjö U. Operative treatment of ankle fracture-dislocations. A follow-up study of 306/321 consecutive cases. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1985;199:28–38. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources