Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2017 Aug 11;7(8):e014813.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014813.

Can promoting awareness of fetal movements and focusing interventions reduce fetal mortality? A stepped-wedge cluster randomised trial (AFFIRM)

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Can promoting awareness of fetal movements and focusing interventions reduce fetal mortality? A stepped-wedge cluster randomised trial (AFFIRM)

Alexander E P Heazell et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Background: In 2013, the stillbirth rate in the UK was 4.2 per 1000 live births, ranking 24th out of 49 high-income countries, with an annual rate of reduction of only 1.4% per year. The majority of stillbirths occur in normally formed infants, with (retrospective) evidence of placental insufficiency the most common clinical finding. Maternal perception of reduced fetal movements (RFM) is associated with placental insufficiency and increased risk of subsequent stillbirth.This study will test the hypothesis that the introduction of a package of care to increase women's awareness of the need for prompt reporting of RFM and standardised management to identify fetal compromise with timely delivery in confirmed cases, will reduce the rate of stillbirth. Following the introduction of a similar intervention in Norway the odds of stillbirth fell by 30%, but the efficacy of this intervention (and possible adverse effects and implications for service delivery) has not been tested in a randomised trial.

Methods: We describe a stepped-wedge cluster trial design, in which participating hospitals in the UK and Ireland will be randomised to the timing of introduction of the care package. Outcomes (including the primary outcome of stillbirth) will be derived from detailed routinely collected maternity data, allowing us to robustly test our hypothesis. The degree of implementation of the intervention will be assessed in each site. A nested qualitative study will examine the acceptability of the intervention to women and healthcare providers and identify process issues including barriers to implementation.

Ethics and dissemination: Ethical approval was obtained from the Scotland A Research Ethics Committee (Ref 13/SS/0001) and from Research and Development offices in participating maternity units. The study started in February 2014 and delivery of the intervention completed in December 2016. Results of the study will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals and disseminated to local investigating sites to inform education and care of women presenting with RFM.

Trial registration number: www.clinicaltrials.gov NCT01777022.

Version: Protocol Version 4.2, 3 February 2017.

Keywords: fetal growth restriction; neonatal death; perinatal mortality; reduced fetal movements; stillbirth.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Stepped-wedge design. The shaded areas (both light and dark) indicate periods in which the interventions are being implemented. The lighter areas indicate the ‘transition’ period during which data will not be collected for the control or intervention group. The order in which hospital groupings implement the interventions will be determined via randomisation.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Flow chart for the management of women presenting with RFMs for sites implementing the AFFIRM study. AC, abdominal circumference; CTG, cardiotocography; DVP, deepest vertical pool; EFW, estimated fetal weight; FGR, fetal growth restriction; FM, fetal movement; IOL, induction of labour; LV, liquor volume; RCOG, Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists; RFM, reduced fetal movement; USS, ultrasound scan.

References

    1. Still-Birth. Definition Act Great Britain. Curr Law Statut Annot GB 1992:1. - PubMed
    1. Flenady V, Wojcieszek AM, Middleton P, et al. Stillbirths: recall to action in high-income countries. Lancet 2016;387:691–702. 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01020-X - DOI - PubMed
    1. Flenady V, Koopmans L, Middleton P, et al. Major risk factors for stillbirth in high-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet 2011;377:1331–40. 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)62233-7 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Manktelow BM, Smith LK, Seaton SE, et al. Perinatal Mortality Surveillance Report - UK Perinatal Deaths for births from January to December 2014. Leicester: The Infant Mortality and Morbidity Group, Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester., 2016.
    1. Lawn JE, Blencowe H, Pattinson R, et al. Lancet’s Stillbirths Series steering committee. Stillbirths: Where? When? Why? How to make the data count? Lancet 2011;377:1448–63. 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)62187-3 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data