Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 May 3;12(1):51-60.
doi: 10.1007/s10433-014-0315-y. eCollection 2015 Mar.

Feeling the squeeze? The effects of combining work and informal caregiving on psychological well-being

Affiliations

Feeling the squeeze? The effects of combining work and informal caregiving on psychological well-being

Thomas Hansen et al. Eur J Ageing. .

Abstract

Does employment provide respite or add stress to caregivers? As a result of population aging and increasing female employment rates, growing numbers are facing the competing demands of paid work and caregiving. This study explores the effect of providing regular personal care by employment status on six dimensions of psychological well-being. We concentrate on partner and parent care recipients and differentiate between in-household and out-of-household caregiving. We use cross-sectional data from the Norwegian Life Course, Ageing and Generation study (n = 11,047, age 25-64). Results indicate that out-of-household caregiving has no significant relationship with men or women's well-being, irrespective of employment status. In-household caregiving, however, relates to lower psychological well-being, but only among women who do not work full-time. The advantages of full-time employment to caregivers may be due to greater opportunity to achieve the full benefits that this role has to offer. There is little to suggest that combining work and caregiving harms well-being. In fact, a "double burden" seems to be experienced by women who combine extensive caregiving with limited employment.

Keywords: Caregiving; Employment; Norway; Personal care; Psychological well-being.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Mean levels of psychological well-being by caregiving and employment status, controlling for age, education, partner, children, and health. Women (n=5655)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Barnett RC, Hyde JS. Women, men, work, and family: an expansionist theory. Am Psychol. 2001;56:781–796. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.56.10.781. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Biddle BJ. Recent developments in role theory. Ann Rev Sociol. 1986;12:67–92. doi: 10.1146/annurev.so.12.080186.000435. - DOI
    1. Borg C, Hallberg I. Life satisfaction among informal caregivers in comparison with non-caregivers. Scand J Caring Sci. 2006;20:427–438. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2006.00424.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bowling A. Measuring health: a review of quality of life measurement scales. Maidenhead: Open University Press; 2005.
    1. Chung H, Tijdens K. Working time flexibility components and working time regimes in Europe: using company-level data across 21 countries. Int J Hum Resour Man. 2013;24:1418–1434. doi: 10.1080/09585192.2012.712544. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources