Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 Aug 7:12:37.
doi: 10.1186/s13017-017-0149-y. eCollection 2017.

2017 update of the WSES guidelines for emergency repair of complicated abdominal wall hernias

Affiliations
Review

2017 update of the WSES guidelines for emergency repair of complicated abdominal wall hernias

Arianna Birindelli et al. World J Emerg Surg. .

Abstract

Emergency repair of complicated abdominal wall hernias may be associated with worsen outcome and a significant rate of postoperative complications. There is no consensus on management of complicated abdominal hernias. The main matter of debate is about the use of mesh in case of intestinal resection and the type of mesh to be used. Wound infection is the most common complication encountered and represents an immense burden especially in the presence of a mesh. The recurrence rate is an important topic that influences the final outcome. A World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES) Consensus Conference was held in Bergamo in July 2013 with the aim to define recommendations for emergency repair of abdominal wall hernias in adults. This document represents the executive summary of the consensus conference approved by a WSES expert panel. In 2016, the guidelines have been revised and updated according to the most recent available literature.

Keywords: Abdominal wall hernia; Biologic mesh; Bowel resection; Contaminated wound; Emergency surgery; Hernia repair; Incarcerated hernia; Infected field; Mesh repair; Strangulated hernia.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Helgstrand F, Rosenberg J, Kehlet H, Bisgaard T. Outcomes after emergency versus elective ventral hernia repair: a prospective nationwide study. World J Surg. 2013;37(10):2273–2279. doi: 10.1007/s00268-013-2123-5. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Miserez M, Alexandre JH, Campanelli G, et al. The European hernia society groin hernia classication: simple and easy to remember. Hernia. 2007;11(2):113–116. doi: 10.1007/s10029-007-0198-3. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Horan TC, Gaynes RP, Martone WJ, Jarvis WR, Grace ET. CDC definitions of nosocomial surgical site infections, 1992: a modification of CDC definitions of surgical wound infections. AJIC Am J Infect Control. 1992;20(5):271–274. doi: 10.1016/S0196-6553(05)80201-9. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Garner J. CDC guideline for prevention of surgical wound infections, 1985. Infect Control. 1986;7(3):193–200. doi: 10.1017/S0195941700064080. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cruse P, Foord R. The epidemiology of wound infection. A ten-year prospective study of 62,939 wounds. Surg Ckin North Am. 1980;60:27–40. doi: 10.1016/S0039-6109(16)42031-1. - DOI - PubMed