Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Oct 28;1(2):57-64.
doi: 10.1200/JGO.2015.000158. eCollection 2015 Dec.

Global Practice and Efficiency of Multidisciplinary Tumor Boards: Results of an American Society of Clinical Oncology International Survey

Nagi S El Saghir  1 , Raghid N Charara  1 , Firas Y Kreidieh  1 , Vanessa Eaton  1 , Kate Litvin  1 , Rania A Farhat  1 , Katia E Khoury  1 , Juliana Breidy  1 , Hani Tamim  1 , Toufic A Eid  1
Affiliations

Global Practice and Efficiency of Multidisciplinary Tumor Boards: Results of an American Society of Clinical Oncology International Survey

Nagi S El Saghir et al. J Glob Oncol. .

Abstract

Purpose: Multidisciplinary tumor boards (MDTBs) are universally recommended, but recent literature has challenged their efficiency.

Methods: The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) conducted a survey of a randomly selected cohort of international ASCO members. The survey was built on SurveyMonkey and was sent via e-mail to a sample of 5,357 members.

Results: In all, 501 ASCO members practicing outside the United States responded, and 86% of them participated in MDTBs at their own institutions. Those who attended represented a variety of disciplines in 70% to 86% of all MDTBs. The majority of MDTBs held weekly specialty and/or general meetings. Eighty-nine percent of 409 respondents attended for advice on treatment decisions. Survey respondents reported changes of 1% to 25% in treatment plans for 44% to 49% of patients with breast cancer and in 47% to 50% of patients with colorectal cancer. They reported 25% to 50% changes in surgery type and/or treatment plans for 14% to 21% of patients with breast cancer and 12% to 18% of patients with colorectal cancer. Of the 430 respondents 96% said overall benefit to patients was worth the time and effort spent at MDTBs, and 96% said that MDTBs have teaching value. Mini tumor boards held with whatever types of specialists were available were considered valid. In all, 94.8% (425 of 448) said that MDTBs should be required in institutions in which patients with cancer are treated.

Conclusion: MDTBs are commonplace worldwide. A majority of respondents attend them to obtain recommendations, and they report changes in patient management. Change occurred more frequently with nonmedical oncologists and with physicians who had less than 15 years in practice. MDTBs helped practitioners make management decisions. Mini tumor boards may improve time efficiency and are favored when the full team is not available. Suggestions for improving MDTBs included making them more efficient, better selection and preparation of cases, choosing an effective team leader, and improving how time is used, but more research is needed on ways to improve the efficiency of MDTBs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest and contributions are found at the end of this article.The following represents disclosure information provided by authors of this manuscript. All relationships are considered compensated. Relationships are self-held unless noted. I = Immediate Family Member, Inst = My Institution. Relationships may not relate to the subject matter of this manuscript. For more information about ASCO's conflict of interest policy, please refer to www.asco.org/rwc or jco.ascopubs.org/site/ifc. Nagi S. El SaghirHonoraria: Roche, Novartis, Merck & Co. Oncology Research Funding: GlaxoSmithKline, Roche Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Novartis, Roche, CelgeneRaghid N. ChararaNo relationship to discloseFiras Y. KreidiehNo relationship to discloseVanessa EatonStock or Other Ownership: AstraZenecaKate LitvinNo relationship to discloseRania A. FarhatNo relationship to discloseKatia E. KhouryNo relationship to discloseJuliana BreidyNo relationship to discloseHani TamimNo relationship to discloseToufic A. EidNo relationship to disclose

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Pie charts showing how patients with GI cancers and early-stage breast cancer are selected for discussion at tumor boards.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Weighted average of suggestions provided by survey respondents for improving the efficiency of tumor boards. Respondents were asked to rank six suggestions in order of importance, and weighted averages were assigned to each answer choice. Better time management at meetings and more effective moderator of discussions were the most highly ranked suggestions.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. El Saghir NS Keating NL Carlson RW, etal: Tumor boards: Optimizing the structure and improving efficiency of multidisciplinary management of patients with cancer worldwide Am Soc Clin Oncol Ed Book e461–e466,2014 - PubMed
    1. Knox S: The European patient advocacy perspective on specialist breast units and accreditation Breast 24:287–289,2015 - PubMed
    1. National Cancer Institute. NCI Dictionary of Cancer Terms: Tumor Board Review. http://www.cancer.gov/dictionary?cdrid=322893.
    1. El Saghir NS El-Asmar N Hajj C, etal: Survey of utilization of multidisciplinary management tumor boards in Arab countries Breast 20:S70–S74,2011 - PubMed
    1. El Saghir NS Farhat RA Charara RN, etal: Enhancing cancer care in areas of limited resources: Our next steps Future Oncol 10:1953–1965,2014 - PubMed