Bicuspid and unicuspid aortic valves: Different phenotypes of the same disease? Insight from the GenTAC Registry
- PMID: 28805011
- PMCID: PMC5819742
- DOI: 10.1111/chd.12520
Bicuspid and unicuspid aortic valves: Different phenotypes of the same disease? Insight from the GenTAC Registry
Abstract
Background: Unicuspid aortic valve (UAV) is a rare disorder, often difficult to distinguish from bicuspid aortic valve (BAV). BAV and UAV share valve pathology such as the presence of a raphe, leaflet fusion, aortic stenosis, aortic regurgitation, and/or ascending aortic dilatation, but a comprehensive echocardiographic comparison of patients with UAV and BAV has not been previously performed.
Methods: We investigated UAV and BAV patients at an early stage of disease included in GenTAC, a national registry of genetically related aortic aneurysms and associated cardiac conditions. Clinical and echocardiographic data from the GenTAC Registry were compared between 17 patients with UAV and 17 matched-controls with BAV.
Results: Baseline characteristics including demographics, clinical findings including family history of BAV and aortic aneurysm/coarctation, and echocardiographic variables were similar between BAV and UAV patients; aortic stenosis was more common and more severe in patients with UAV. This was evidenced by higher mean and peak gradient, smaller aortic valve area, and more advanced valvular degeneration (all P < .05). There were no significant differences in aortic dimensions, with a similar pattern of enlargement of the ascending aorta.
Conclusions: The similar baseline characteristics with more accelerated aortic valve degeneration and stenosis suggest that UAV represents an extreme in the spectrum of BAV syndromes. Therefore, it is reasonable to consider application of recommendations for the management of patients with BAV to those with the rarer UAV.
Keywords: bicuspid aortic valve; congenital heart disease; unicuspid aortic valve.
© 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Conflict of interest statement
There are no author conflicts of interest to report.
Figures

References
-
- Mookadam F, Thota VR, Garcia-Lopez AM, Emani UR, Alharthi MS, Zamorano J, Khandheria BK. Unicuspid aortic valve in adults: a systemic review. J Heart Valve Dis. 2010;19:79–85. - PubMed
-
- Roberts WC, Ko JM. Weights of operatively-excised stenotic unicuspid, bicuspid, and tricuspid aortic valves and their relation to age, sex, body mass index, and presence of absence of concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting. Am J Cardiol. 2003;92:1057–1065. - PubMed
-
- Debl K, Djavidani B, Buchner S, Poschenrieder F, Heinicke N, Schmid C, Kobuch R, Feuerbach S, Riegger G, Luchner A. Unicuspid aortic valve disease: a magnetic resonance imaging study. Fortschr Röntgenstr. 2008;180:983–987. - PubMed
-
- Bansal A, Arora S, Traub D, Haybron D. Unicuspid aortic valve and aortic arch aneurysm in a patient with Turner syndrome. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann. 2008;16:266–267. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical