Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2017 Sep;60(5):305-310.
doi: 10.1503/cjs.005716.

Changes in patient characteristics following cardiac transplantation: the Montreal Heart Institute experience

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Changes in patient characteristics following cardiac transplantation: the Montreal Heart Institute experience

Nicola Vistarini et al. Can J Surg. 2017 Sep.

Abstract

Background: Heart transplantation is no longer considered an experimental operation, but rather a standard treatment; nevertheless the context has changed substantially in recent years owing to donor shortage. The aim of this study was to review the heart transplant experience focusing on very long-term survival (≥ 20 years) and to compare the initial results with the current era.

Methods: From April 1983 through April 1995, 156 consecutive patients underwent heart transplantation. Patients who survived 20 years or longer (group 1) were compared with patients who died within 20 years after surgery (group 2). To compare patient characteristics with the current era, we evaluated our recent 5-year experience (group 3; patients who underwent transplantation between 2010 and 2015), focusing on differences in terms of donor and recipient characteristics.

Results: Group 1 (n = 46, 30%) included younger patients (38 ± 11 v. 48 ± 8 yr, p = 0.001), a higher proportion of female recipients (28% v. 8%, p = 0.001) and a lower prevalence of ischemic heart disease (42% v. 65%, p = 0.001) than group 2 (n = 110, 70%). Patients in group 3 (n = 54) were older (52 ± 12 v. 38 ± 11 yr, p = 0.001), sicker (rate of hospital admission at transplantation 48% v. 20%, p = 0.001) and transplanted with organs from older donors (42 ± 15 v. 29 ± 11 yr, p = 0.001) than those in group 1.

Conclusion: Very long-term survival ( ≥ 20 yr) was observed in 30% of patients transplanted during the first decade of our experience. This outcome will be difficult to duplicate in the current era considering our present population of older and sicker patients transplanted with organs from older donors.

Contexte: De nos jours, la transplantation cardiaque n'est plus considérée comme une intervention expérimentale, mais bien comme une opération standard; mais le contexte a substantiellement changé ces dernières années en raison d'une pénurie de donneurs. Cette étude avait pour but de faire le point sur la situation de la greffe cardiaque, et plus particulièrement sur la survie à très long terme (≥ 20 ans), et de la comparer aux résultats initiaux.

Méthodes: Entre avril 1983 et avril 1995, 156 patients consécutifs ont subi une greffe cardiaque. Les patients qui ont survécu 20 ans ou plus (groupe 1) ont été comparés aux patients décédés moins de 20 ans après l'intervention (groupe 2). Pour comparer les caractéristiques des premiers patients à celles des cas plus récents, nous avons fait un bilan des 5 années allant de 2010 à 2015 (groupe 3), en portant attention aux différences quant aux caractéristiques des donneurs et des receveurs.

Résultats: Le groupe 1 (n = 46, 30 %) incluait des patients plus jeunes (38 ± 11 ans c. 48 ± 8 ans, p = 0,001), une proportion plus élevée de femmes (28 % c. 8 %, p = 0,001) et la prévalence de maladie cardiaque ischémique y était moindre (42 % c. 65 %, p = 0,001) comparativement au groupe 2 (n = 110, 70 %). Les patients du groupe 3 (n = 54) étaient plus âgés (52 ± 12 ans c. 38 ± 11 ans, p = 0,001), plus malades (taux d'hospitalisation au moment de la transplantation 48 % c. 20 %, p = 0,001) et ont reçu le cœur de donneurs plus âgés (42 ± 15 ans c. 29 ± 11 ans, p = 0,001) que ceux du groupe 1.

Conclusion: Une survie à très long terme (≥ 20 ans) a été observée chez 30 % des patients ayant reçu leur greffe au cours de la première décennie de notre expérience. Ce résultat sera difficile à reproduire de nos jours étant donné que notre population actuelle est constituée de receveurs plus âgés et plus malades, qui reçoivent le cœur de donneurs plus âgés.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Kaplan–Meier curve for survival after cardiac transplantation for patients operated between 1984 and 1995. Patient survival at 1, 5, 10, 15 and 20 years averaged 84% ± 3%, 76% ± 3%, 69% ± 4%, 49% ± 4% and 35% ± 4%, respectively. The number of patients at risk is shown at the bottom of the graph.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Freedom from cancer after cardiac transplantation. The freedom rate from cancer averaged 82% ± 6% and 61% ± 7%, respectively, 10 and 20 years after transplantation in group 1 patients compared with 64% ± 6% and 30% ± 9%, respectively, in group 2. The difference was significant using the log-rank test (p = 0.005).
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Freedom from development of graft vasculopathy. The freedom rate from allograft vasculopathy (also called chronic rejection), defined by any coronary artery lesions at planned and unplanned coronary angiography, averaged 44% ± 7% and 39% ± 7%, respectively, 10 and 15 years after transplantation in patients of group 1 compared with 46% ± 6% and 36% ± 6%, respectively, in group 2 patients. The difference was not significant (p = 0.96).

References

    1. Lund LH, Edwards LB, Kucheryavaya AY, et al. The Registry of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation: thirtieth official adult heart transplant report-2013; focus theme: age. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2013;32:951–64. - PubMed
    1. Hertz MI, Taylor DO, Trulock EP, et al. The Registry of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation: nineteenth official report-2002. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2002;21:950–70. - PubMed
    1. Wilhelm MJ. Long-term outcome following heart transplantation: current perspective. J Thorac Dis. 2015;7:549–51. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aziz T, Burgess M, Khafagy R, et al. Bicaval and standard techniques in orthotopic heart transplantation: medium-term experience in cardiac performance and survival. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1999;118:115–22. - PubMed
    1. Jacob S, Sellke F. Is bicaval orthotopic heart transplantation superior to the biatrial technique? Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2009;9:333–42. - PubMed

Publication types