Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2017 Nov-Dec;10(6):1102-1111.
doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2017.07.011. Epub 2017 Jul 31.

The reliability of commonly used electrophysiology measures

K E Brown  1 , K R Lohse  2 , I M S Mayer  3 , G Strigaro  4 , M Desikan  4 , E P Casula  4 , S Meunier  5 , T Popa  5 , J-C Lamy  5 , O Odish  6 , B R Leavitt  7 , A Durr  5 , R A C Roos  6 , S J Tabrizi  8 , J C Rothwell  4 , L A Boyd  1 , M Orth  9
Affiliations
Observational Study

The reliability of commonly used electrophysiology measures

K E Brown et al. Brain Stimul. 2017 Nov-Dec.

Abstract

Background: Electrophysiological measures can help understand brain function both in healthy individuals and in the context of a disease. Given the amount of information that can be extracted from these measures and their frequent use, it is essential to know more about their inherent reliability.

Objective/hypothesis: To understand the reliability of electrophysiology measures in healthy individuals. We hypothesized that measures of threshold and latency would be the most reliable and least susceptible to methodological differences between study sites.

Methods: Somatosensory evoked potentials from 112 control participants; long-latency reflexes, transcranial magnetic stimulation with resting and active motor thresholds, motor evoked potential latencies, input/output curves, and short-latency sensory afferent inhibition and facilitation from 84 controls were collected at 3 visits over 24 months at 4 Track-On HD study sites. Reliability was assessed using intra-class correlation coefficients for absolute agreement, and the effects of reliability on statistical power are demonstrated for different sample sizes and study designs.

Results: Measures quantifying latencies, thresholds, and evoked responses at high stimulator intensities had the highest reliability, and required the smallest sample sizes to adequately power a study. Very few between-site differences were detected.

Conclusions: Reliability and susceptibility to between-site differences should be evaluated for electrophysiological measures before including them in study designs. Levels of reliability vary substantially across electrophysiological measures, though there are few between-site differences. To address this, reliability should be used in conjunction with theoretical calculations to inform sample size and ensure studies are adequately powered to detect true change in measures of interest.

Keywords: Motor thresholds; Reliability; SEP; Statistical power; Study design; Transcranial magnetic stimulation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources