Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jul 18;8(7):561-566.
doi: 10.5312/wjo.v8.i7.561.

Non-ossifying fibromas: Case series, including in uncommon upper extremity sites

Affiliations

Non-ossifying fibromas: Case series, including in uncommon upper extremity sites

Akio Sakamoto et al. World J Orthop. .

Abstract

Aim: To investigate non-ossifying fibromas (NOFs) common fibrous bone lesions in children that occur in bones of the lower extremities.

Methods: We analyzed 44 cases of NOF including 47 lesions, which were referred with a working diagnosis of neoplastic lesions. Lesions were located in the upper extremities (1 proximal humerus, 1 distal radius) and the lower extremities (25 distal femurs, 12 proximal and 4 distal tibias, and 4 proximal fibulas).

Results: Three cases had NOFs in multiple anatomical locations (femur and fibula in 1 case, femur and tibia in 2 cases). Overall, larger lesions > 4 cm and lesion expansion at the cortex were seen in 21% and 32% of cases, respectively. Multiple lesions with bilateral symmetry in the lower extremities suggest that these NOFs were developmental bone defects. Two patients suffered from fracture and were treated without surgery, one in the radius and one in the femur. Lesions in the upper extremities (i.e., humerus of a 4-year-old female and radius of a 9-year-old male) expanded at the cortex and lesion size increased with slow ossification.

Conclusion: NOFs in the lower extremity had fewer clinical problems, regardless of their size and expansiveness. In these two upper extremity cases, the NOFs had aggressive biological features. It seems that there is a site specific difference, especially between the upper extremity and the lower extremity. Furthermore, NOFs in the radius are predisposed to fracture because of the slender structure of the radius and the susceptibility to stress.

Keywords: Fibula; Humerus; Non-ossifying fibroma; Radius; Upper extremity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict-of-interest statement: The authors have no financial relationships to disclose.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Plain radiographs of a non-ossifying fibroma in the humerus of a 4-year-old female. An osteolytic lesion is shown at the cortex in the proximal humerus (A). Radiographs taken after 7 mo (B), 1 year (C), 1 year and 7 mo (D), and 2 years and 7 mo (E) together reveal the location of the lesion became more distal with growth of the child. The size of the lesion increased as it slowly ossified (plain radiographs: Anteroposterior view, top; lateral view, bottom).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Plain radiographs of a non-ossifying fibroma in the radius of a 9-year-old male. At the initial assessment an osteolytic lesion in the distal radius is shown with an osteosclerotic rim. Fracture of the irregular adjacent cortex is revealed (A). Radiographs taken after 11 mo (B), 2 years and 1 mo (C), 2 years and 5 mo (D), and 3 years (E). The size of the lesion increased and ossification at the distal end was observed (plain radiographs: Anteroposterior view, top; lateral view, bottom).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Plain radiograph and MRI of a NOF in the femur of a 13-year-old male who sustained a fracture. The plain radiographs reveal a multinodular lesion located at the medial posterior part of the distal femur. The lesion is osteolytic at the distal end and ossified at the proximal end. The lesion has expanded at the medial cortex (A). T2-weighted fat-suppression MRIs show high signal intensity and suggest the presence of a fracture (B) (coronal, top; axial, bottom). Radiographs taken after 1 year (C), 1 year and 8 mo (D), and 2 years and 8 mo (E); these radiographs reveal the lesion had enlarged as well as ossified (plain radiographs: anteroposterior view, top; lateral view, bottom) .
Figure 4
Figure 4
Plain radiographs of non-ossifying fibromas in the femur and the fibula of a 13-year-old female. The radiographs reveal an osteolytic lesion in the proximal fibula, as well as a NOF in the distal femur (A). Radiographs taken after 9 mo (B) and 1 year and 9 mo (C); the femoral and fibular lesions ossified (plain radiographs: Anteroposterior view, top; lateral view, bottom).

References

    1. Hetts SW, Hilchey SD, Wilson R, Franc B. Case 110: Nonossifying fibroma. Radiology. 2007;243:288–292. - PubMed
    1. Dorfman HD, Czerniak B. Bone tumors. St Louis, MO, Mosby, 1998. Hum Pathol. 1999;30:1269. - PubMed
    1. Betsy M, Kupersmith LM, Springfield DS. Metaphyseal fibrous defects. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2004;12:89–95. - PubMed
    1. Hod N, Levi Y, Fire G, Cohen I, Ayash D, Somekh M, Horne T. Scintigraphic characteristics of non-ossifying fibroma in military recruits undergoing bone scintigraphy for suspected stress fractures and lower limb pains. Nucl Med Commun. 2007;28:25–33. - PubMed
    1. Nelson M, Perry D, Ginsburg G, Sanger WG, Neff JR, Bridge JA. Translocation (1; 4)(p31; q34) in nonossifying fibroma. Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 2003;142:142–144. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources