Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Mar 20;6(3):1090-1117.
doi: 10.3390/ma6031090.

Towards a Consensus View on Understanding Nanomaterials Hazards and Managing Exposure: Knowledge Gaps and Recommendations

Affiliations

Towards a Consensus View on Understanding Nanomaterials Hazards and Managing Exposure: Knowledge Gaps and Recommendations

Geoffrey Hunt et al. Materials (Basel). .

Abstract

The aim of this article is to present an overview of salient issues of exposure, characterisation and hazard assessment of nanomaterials as they emerged from the consensus-building of experts undertaken within the four year European Commission coordination project NanoImpactNet. The approach adopted is to consolidate and condense the findings and problem-identification in such a way as to identify knowledge-gaps and generate a set of interim recommendations of use to industry, regulators, research bodies and funders. The categories of recommendation arising from the consensual view address: significant gaps in vital factual knowledge of exposure, characterisation and hazards; the development, dissemination and standardisation of appropriate laboratory protocols; address a wide range of technical issues in establishing an adequate risk assessment platform; the more efficient and coordinated gathering of basic data; greater inter-organisational cooperation; regulatory harmonization; the wider use of the life-cycle approaches; and the wider involvement of all stakeholders in the discussion and solution-finding efforts for nanosafety.

Keywords: consensus building; exposure; hazard; life cycle approach; monitoring; nanomaterial characterisation; nanosafety; nanotoxicology; occupational health; protocols; release.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. The project on Emerging Nanotechnology. [(accessed on 12 March 2013.)]. Available online: http://www.nanotechproject.org/inventories/
    1. Hunt G., Riediker M. Building expert consensus on uncertainty and complexity in nanomaterial safety. Nanotechnol. Percept. 2011;7:82–98. doi: 10.4024/N07HU11A.ntp.07.02. - DOI
    1. Riediker M., Lynch I., Hunt G., Berges M., Byrne H., Clift M., Rothen-Rutishauser B., Tran L., Fernandes T., Kuhlbusch T., Dusinska M., Hart D., Cassee F. NanoImpactNet Reports. Institute for Work and Health; Lausanne, Switzerland: 2012. [(accessed on 12 March 2013)]. NanoImpactNet: Final integrating scientific report. Available online: http://www.nanoimpactnet.eu/index.php?page=reports.
    1. Bouwmeester H., Lynch I., Marvin H., Dawson K., Berges M., Braguer D., Byrne H.J., Casey A., Chambers G., Clift M., et al. Minimal analytical characterization of engineered nanomaterials needed for hazard assessment in biological matrices. Nanotoxicology. 2011;5:1–11. doi: 10.3109/17435391003775266. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lynch I., Bouwmeester H., Marvin H., Casey A., Chambers G., Berges M., Clift M.J.D., Fernandes T.F., Fjellsbø L., Juillerat L., et al. NanoImpactNet Reports. Institute for Work and Health; Lausanne, Switzerland: 2009. [(accessed on 12 March 2013)]. First approaches to standard protocols and reference materials for the assessment of potential hazards associated with nanomaterials. Available online: http://www.nanoimpactnet.eu/index.php?page=reports.

LinkOut - more resources