Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2017 Aug 15;14(8):e1002369.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002369. eCollection 2017 Aug.

Benefits and safety of gabapentinoids in chronic low back pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Benefits and safety of gabapentinoids in chronic low back pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Harsha Shanthanna et al. PLoS Med. .

Abstract

Background and objective: Chronic Low Back Pain (CLBP) is very common, with a lifetime prevalence between 51% and 80%. In majority, it is nonspecific in nature and multifactorial in etiology. Pregabalin (PG) and Gabapentin (GB) are gabapentinoids that have demonstrated benefit in neuropathic pain conditions. Despite no clear rationale, they are increasingly used for nonspecific CLBP. They necessitate prolonged use and are associated with adverse effects and increased cost. Recent guidelines from the National Health Service (NHS), England, expressed concerns on their off-label use, in addition to the risk of misuse. We aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of gabapentinoids in adult CLBP patients.

Methods: Electronic databases of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane were searched from their inception until December 20th, 2016. We included randomized control trials reporting the use of gabapentinoids for the treatment of CLBP of >3 months duration, in adult patients. Study selection and data extraction was performed independently by paired reviewers. Outcomes were guided by Initiative on Methods, Measurement and Pain Assessment in Clinical Trials guidelines, with pain relief and safety as the primary outcomes. Meta-analyses were performed for outcomes reported in 3 or more studies. Outcomes were reported as mean differences (MDs) or risk ratios (RRs) with their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and I2 in percentage representing the percentage variability in effect estimates that could be explained by heterogeneity. GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) was used to assess the quality of evidence.

Results: Out of 1,385 citations, eight studies were included. Based on the interventions and comparators, studies were analyzed in 3 different groups. GB compared with placebo (3 studies, n = 185) showed minimal improvement of pain (MD = 0.22 units, 95% CI [-0.5 to 0.07] I2 = 0%; GRADE: very low). Three studies compared PG with other types of analgesic medication (n = 332) and showed greater improvement in the other analgesic group (MD = 0.42 units, 95% CI [0.20 to 0.64] I2 = 0; GRADE: very low). Studies using PG as an adjuvant (n = 423) were not pooled due to heterogeneity, but the largest of them showed no benefit of adding PG to tapentadol. There were no deaths or hospitalizations reported. Compared with placebo, the following adverse events were more commonly reported with GB: dizziness-(RR = 1.99, 95% CI [1.17 to 3.37], I2 = 49); fatigue (RR = 1.85, 95% CI [1.12 to 3.05], I2 = 0); difficulties with mentation (RR = 3.34, 95% CI [1.54 to 7.25], I2 = 0); and visual disturbances (RR = 5.72, 95% CI [1.94 to 16.91], I2 = 0). The number needed to harm with 95% CI for dizziness, fatigue, difficulties with mentation, and visual disturbances were 7 (4 to 30), 8 (4 to 44), 6 (4 to 15), and 6 (4 to 13) respectively. The GRADE evidence quality was noted to be very low for dizziness and fatigue, low for difficulties with mentation, and moderate for visual disturbances. Functional and emotional improvements were reported by few studies and showed no significant improvements.

Conclusions and relevance: Existing evidence on the use of gabapentinoids in CLBP is limited and demonstrates significant risk of adverse effects without any demonstrated benefit. Given the lack of efficacy, risks, and costs associated, the use of gabapentinoids for CLBP merits caution. There is need for large high-quality trials to more definitively inform this issue.

Trial registration: PROSPERO CRD42016034040.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. PRISMA flow diagram.
Fig 2
Fig 2. RoB within the included studies.
RoB, risk of bias.
Fig 3
Fig 3. Analyses of pain relief with GB or PG in patients with CLBP.
CLBP, chronic low back pain; GB, gabapentin; IV, intravenous; M-H, Mantel-Haenszel; PG, pregabalin.
Fig 4
Fig 4. Analyses of adverse effects observed with GB or PG in CLBP.
CLBP, chronic low back pain; GB, gabapentin; IV, intravenous; M-H, Mantel-Haenszel; PG, pregabalin.

Similar articles

  • Antiepileptic drugs for chronic non-cancer pain in children and adolescents.
    Cooper TE, Wiffen PJ, Heathcote LC, Clinch J, Howard R, Krane E, Lord SM, Sethna N, Schechter N, Wood C. Cooper TE, et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Aug 5;8(8):CD012536. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012536.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017. PMID: 28779491 Free PMC article.
  • Antidepressants for chronic non-cancer pain in children and adolescents.
    Cooper TE, Heathcote LC, Clinch J, Gold JI, Howard R, Lord SM, Schechter N, Wood C, Wiffen PJ. Cooper TE, et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Aug 5;8(8):CD012535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012535.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017. PMID: 28779487 Free PMC article.
  • Gabapentin for chronic neuropathic pain in adults.
    Wiffen PJ, Derry S, Bell RF, Rice AS, Tölle TR, Phillips T, Moore RA. Wiffen PJ, et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jun 9;6(6):CD007938. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007938.pub4. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017. PMID: 28597471 Free PMC article.
  • Topical clonidine for neuropathic pain in adults.
    Serednicki WT, Wrzosek A, Woron J, Garlicki J, Dobrogowski J, Jakowicka-Wordliczek J, Wordliczek J, Zajaczkowska R. Serednicki WT, et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 19;5(5):CD010967. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010967.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 35587172 Free PMC article.
  • Gabapentin for fibromyalgia pain in adults.
    Cooper TE, Derry S, Wiffen PJ, Moore RA. Cooper TE, et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jan 3;1(1):CD012188. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012188.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017. PMID: 28045473 Free PMC article.

Cited by

References

    1. Deyo RA, Weinstein JN. Low back pain. The New England journal of medicine. 2001;344(5):363–70. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200102013440508 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hooten WM, Cohen SP. Evaluation and Treatment of Low Back Pain: A Clinically Focused Review for Primary Care Specialists. Mayo Clin Proc. 2015;90(12):1699–718. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2015.10.009 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hoy D, Bain C, Williams G, March L, Brooks P, Blyth F, et al. A systematic review of the global prevalence of low back pain. Arthritis Rheum. 2012;64(6):2028–37. doi: 10.1002/art.34347 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Morlion B. Chronic low back pain: pharmacological, interventional and surgical strategies. Nature reviews Neurology. 2013;9(8):462–73. doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2013.130 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Shanthanna H, Gilron I, Thabane L, Devereaux PJ, Bhandari M, AlAmri R, et al. Gabapentinoids for chronic low back pain: a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ open. 2016;6(11). - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms