Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Case Reports
. 2017 Oct;18(4):289-295.
doi: 10.14744/AnatolJCardiol.2017.7821. Epub 2017 Aug 11.

Cardiac implantable electronic device lead extraction using the lead-locking device system: keeping it simple, safe, and inexpensive with mechanical tools and local anesthesia

Affiliations
Case Reports

Cardiac implantable electronic device lead extraction using the lead-locking device system: keeping it simple, safe, and inexpensive with mechanical tools and local anesthesia

Antonis S Manolis et al. Anatol J Cardiol. 2017 Oct.

Abstract

Objective: We have previously reported our successful approach for percutaneous cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) lead extraction using inexpensive tools, which we have continued over the years. Herein we report the results of the systematic use of a unique stylet, the lead-locking device (LLD), which securely locks the entire lead lumen, aided with non-powered telescoping sheaths in 54 patients to extract 98 CIED leads.

Methods: This prospective observational clinical study included 38 men and 16 women aged 68.9±13.1 years undergoing lead extraction for device infection (n=46), lead malfunction (n=5), or prior to defibrillator implant (n=3). Leads were in place for 6.7±4.3 years. Infections were more commonly due to Staphylococcus species (n=40). There were 78 pacing (31 ventricular, 37 atrial, 4 VDD, and 6 coronary sinus leads) and 20 defibrillating leads.

Results: Using simple traction (6 leads) and the LLD stylets (92 leads) aided with telescoping sheaths (15 patients), 96 (98%) leads in 52 (96.3%) patients were successfully removed, with all but one leads removed using a subclavian approach; in 1 patient, the right femoral approach was also required. In 2 patients, distal fragments from one ventricular pacing and one defibrillating lead could not be removed. Finally, lead removal was completely (52/54) (96.3%) or partially (2/54) (3.7%) successful in 54 patients for 96 of 98 leads (98%) without major complications.

Conclusion: Percutaneous lead extraction can be successful with mechanical tools using the LLD locking stylet aided with non-powered telescoping sheaths through a simplified, safe, and inexpensive procedure using local anesthesia.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The LLD locking stylet is depicted in this figure in its unlocked, locked state when deployed (locked) inside the lead lumen. Of note is the apparent expanded mesh appearance of the locking mechanism, allowing for a more uniform traction along several points along the lead body
Figure 2
Figure 2
Telescoping sheaths are an invaluable tool to dissect through the adhesions formed in various contact points along the endovenous and endocardial course of the lead and to facilitate its extraction (a) as well as to apply counter traction at the lodging point of a ventricular lead anchored at the endocardium, aiding in disengaging the lead often with a thick fibrous tissue attached to it (b), hopefully, without the feared complication of cardiac perforation and tamponade. When the above approach (subclavian access) fails, a transfemoral approach using a snare can successfully remove even grossly uncoiled and deformed leads and their fragments (c). The LLD plus telescoping sheath method is equally effective in removing multiple leads, including those in the coronary sinus (d) CS - (lead already pulled in the) coronary sinus (from a vein tributary); RA - right atrial (lead); RV - right ventricular (lead); TW - temporary wire
None
Biochemist, MD. Meral Eguz’s collections

Comment in

  • Transvenous lead extraction: Can it be simple yet safe?
    Antoniadis AP, Vassilikos VP. Antoniadis AP, et al. Anatol J Cardiol. 2017 Oct;18(4):296-297. doi: 10.14744/AnatolJCardiol.2017.25858. Anatol J Cardiol. 2017. PMID: 29076815 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
  • Lead extraction: Definition standards.
    Çay S, Özcan F, Özeke Ö. Çay S, et al. Anatol J Cardiol. 2018 Feb;19(2):152. doi: 10.14744/AnatolJCardiol.2017.8210. Anatol J Cardiol. 2018. PMID: 29424738 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
  • Lead extraction and contrast venography.
    Uçar FM. Uçar FM. Anatol J Cardiol. 2018 Feb;19(2):153-154. doi: 10.14744/AnatolJCardiol.2017.8211. Anatol J Cardiol. 2018. PMID: 29424740 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

References

    1. Deharo JC, Bongiorni MG, Rozkovec A, Bracke F, Defaye P, Fernandez-Lozano I, et al. Pathways for training and accreditation for transvenous lead extraction: a European Heart Rhythm Association position paper. Europace. 2012;14:124–34. - PubMed
    1. Mond HG, Proclemer A. The 11thworld survey of cardiac pacing and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: calendar year 2009--a World Society of Arrhythmia's project. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2011;34:1013–27. - PubMed
    1. Greenspon AJ, Patel JD, Lau E, Ochoa JA, Frisch DR, Ho RT, et al. 16-year trends in the infection burden for pacemakers and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in the United States 1993 to 2008. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;58:1001–6. - PubMed
    1. Grazia Bongiorni M, Dagres N, Estner H, Pison L, Todd D, Blomstrom-Lundqvist C, et al. Management of malfunctioning and recalled pacemaker and defibrillator leads: results of the European Heart Rhythm Association survey. Europace. 2014;16:1674–8. - PubMed
    1. Smith HJ, Fearnot NE, Byrd CL, Wilkoff BL, Love CJ, Sellers TD. Five-years experience with intravascular lead extraction. U.S. Lead Extraction Database. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1994;17:2016–20. - PubMed