Five-Year Outcomes after On-Pump and Off-Pump Coronary-Artery Bypass
- PMID: 28813218
- DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1614341
Five-Year Outcomes after On-Pump and Off-Pump Coronary-Artery Bypass
Abstract
Background: Coronary-artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery may be performed either with cardiopulmonary bypass (on pump) or without cardiopulmonary bypass (off pump). We report the 5-year clinical outcomes in patients who had been included in the Veterans Affairs trial of on-pump versus off-pump CABG.
Methods: From February 2002 through June 2007, we randomly assigned 2203 patients at 18 medical centers to undergo either on-pump or off-pump CABG, with 1-year assessments completed by May 2008. The two primary 5-year outcomes were death from any cause and a composite outcome of major adverse cardiovascular events, defined as death from any cause, repeat revascularization (CABG or percutaneous coronary intervention), or nonfatal myocardial infarction. Secondary 5-year outcomes included death from cardiac causes, repeat revascularization, and nonfatal myocardial infarction. Primary outcomes were assessed at a P value of 0.05 or less, and secondary outcomes at a P value of 0.01 or less.
Results: The rate of death at 5 years was 15.2% in the off-pump group versus 11.9% in the on-pump group (relative risk, 1.28; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.03 to 1.58; P=0.02). The rate of major adverse cardiovascular events at 5 years was 31.0% in the off-pump group versus 27.1% in the on-pump group (relative risk, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.00 to 1.30; P=0.046). For the 5-year secondary outcomes, no significant differences were observed: for nonfatal myocardial infarction, the rate was 12.1% in the off-pump group and 9.6% in the on-pump group (P=0.05); for death from cardiac causes, the rate was 6.3% and 5.3%, respectively (P=0.29); for repeat revascularization, the rate was 13.1% and 11.9%, respectively (P=0.39); and for repeat CABG, the rate was 1.4% and 0.5%, respectively (P=0.02).
Conclusions: In this randomized trial, off-pump CABG led to lower rates of 5-year survival and event-free survival than on-pump CABG. (Funded by the Department of Veterans Affairs Office of Research and Development Cooperative Studies Program and others; ROOBY-FS ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01924442 .).
Comment in
-
Changing the Discussion about On-Pump versus Off-Pump CABG.N Engl J Med. 2017 Aug 17;377(7):692-693. doi: 10.1056/NEJMe1706220. N Engl J Med. 2017. PMID: 28813212 No abstract available.
-
Five-Year Outcomes after On-Pump and Off-Pump Coronary-Artery Bypass.N Engl J Med. 2017 Nov 9;377(19):1896-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1712000. N Engl J Med. 2017. PMID: 29120116 No abstract available.
-
Five-Year Outcomes after On-Pump and Off-Pump Coronary-Artery Bypass.N Engl J Med. 2017 Nov 9;377(19):1897. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1712000. N Engl J Med. 2017. PMID: 29120120 No abstract available.
-
Five-Year Outcomes after On-Pump and Off-Pump Coronary-Artery Bypass.N Engl J Med. 2017 Nov 9;377(19):1897-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1712000. N Engl J Med. 2017. PMID: 29120121 No abstract available.
-
Is there a long-term survival benefit with on pump coronary artery bypass grafting?Ann Transl Med. 2017 Dec;5(24):498. doi: 10.21037/atm.2017.10.10. Ann Transl Med. 2017. PMID: 29299459 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
The lion and the unicorn were fighting for the crown: on-pump versus off-pump coronary-artery bypass grafting.J Thorac Dis. 2017 Dec;9(12):4893-4895. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2017.11.78. J Thorac Dis. 2017. PMID: 29312685 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical