Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Sep/Oct;132(5):585-592.
doi: 10.1177/0033354917722994. Epub 2017 Aug 16.

Transitioning From Paper to Digital: State Statutory and Regulatory Frameworks for Health Information Technology

Cason Schmit  1   2 , Gregory Sunshine  1 , Dawn Pepin  1 , Tara Ramanathan  3 , Akshara Menon  1 , Matthew Penn  3
Affiliations

Transitioning From Paper to Digital: State Statutory and Regulatory Frameworks for Health Information Technology

Cason Schmit et al. Public Health Rep. 2017 Sep/Oct.

Abstract

Objectives: In all health system sectors, electronic health information (EHI) is created, used, released, and reused. We examined states' efforts to address EHI uses in law to provide an understanding of the EHI legal environment.

Methods: Attorney researchers used WestlawNext to search for EHI-related statutes and regulations of the US states, US territories, and the District of Columbia in effect as of January 2014. The researchers independently catalogued provisions by the EHI use described in the law. Researchers resolved discrepancies through peer review meetings and recorded the consensus codes for each law.

Results: This study identified 2364 EHI-related laws representing 49 EHI uses in 54 jurisdictions. A total of 18 EHI uses were regulated by ≥10 jurisdictions. More than 750 laws addressed 2 or more EHI uses. Jurisdictions varied by the number of EHI laws in effect, with a mean of 44 laws. Texas had the most EHI laws (n = 145). Hawaii and South Carolina had the fewest (n = 14 each).

Conclusions: The EHI legal landscape is complex. The large quantity and diversity of laws complicate legal analysis, likely delay implementation of public health solutions, and might be detrimental to the development of emerging health information technology. Research is needed to understand the effect of EHI-related laws.

Keywords: health information; health information technology; law; regulation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

References

    1. Ramanathan T, Schmit C, Menon A, Fox C. The role of law in supporting secondary uses of electronic health information. J Law Med Ethics. 2015;43(suppl 1):48–51. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pub L No. 111-5, Div A, Title XIII, §13001 et seq, Div B, Title IV, §4001 et seq (2009).
    1. Safran C, Bloomrosen M, Hammond WE, et al. Toward a national framework for the secondary use of health data: an American Medical Informatics Association white paper. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2007;14(1):1–9. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Blumenthal D, Tavenner M. The “meaningful use” regulation for electronic health records. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(6):501–504. - PubMed
    1. Hills RA, Lober WB, Painter IS. Biosurveillance, case reporting, and decision support: public health interactions with a health information exchange In: Zeng D, Chen H, Rolka H, Lober B, eds. Biosurveillance and Biosecurity. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2008:10–21.

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources